This page uses extracted PDF text. Text can misread numbers, dates or table columns. Check the PDF before quoting or interpreting it. Redacted areas remain redacted.
Gaskin and Associates Consulting Group, LLC
NNPS proposal
October 8 2026
22
Complete the comparison before recommendation
The next product is a priced school-by-school comparison for the retained alternatives. This report
supplies baseline pupils, candidate receivers, capacity intervals and allowance cash flows. NNPS
must join them to the local grade, room, duty and ledger evidence below. Proposed responsibilities
are not accepted commitments.
Comparison to
complete
Proposed responsible
offices
Acceptance evidence
DSES → NP/AA and
NP → DSES/AA
WXY, academics,
principals, Facilities, HR
Each grade/required program placed in usable rooms
with qualified staff; effect on current receiver pupils
shown
Both forecast paths
Planning, WXY, Finance
Common dated baseline and school/grade projections;
housing and progression reconciliation; annual
headroom under each model
Actual transportation
duties
Transportation, HR,
evaluation lead
Student origins linked privately to proposed routes;
required service and safe walks; tested ride tails, paid
hours and multi-day baseline
Campus and route cash
flows
CFO, City Finance,
Facilities
Year-by-year avoided funded cost minus
receiver/transport/holding cost; transition quotes,
commitments and funding identified
Instructional pilot
service
Academics, principal,
special services
Grades, unique beneficiaries, delivered minutes,
timetable, staffing, measurement and access
arrangements priced
Decision sequence aligned with the study
October: freeze the common records and contract-scope reconciliation; establish a multi-day transport
and parent-observation baseline. November: complete the two receiving comparisons and viable
additional alternatives. December: publish the populated grade, service, burden and annual-cost
sheets with the draft scenarios. January 2027: present a funded recommendation with unresolved
conditions and a contingency plan. [S75; proposed work sequence]
The district priorities survey is open through October 12, with December draft scenarios and January
consideration announced for possible 2027–28 implementation. Survey responses need role,
duplicate and sampling checks before being treated as parent prevalence. The VDOE annual
transportation report due October 31 can reconcile annual miles, pupils and expenditures; it does not
replace trip reliability evidence. No NNPS filing has been authenticated here. [S75, S78]
Before any 2027–28 launch, responsible offices should verify receiving rooms and staffing,
appropriate legal authority, appropriations, tested routes, individual transition arrangements and a
fallback if readiness slips. Evaluate delivered instruction, service reliability and full costs before
expansion. Independent school-finance, transportation, instructional and facilities review should use
the same populated sheets and record supported disagreements.Jump to an indexed page (48 of 48)