INDEPENDENT LOCAL NEWSNewport News, Virginia
Back to the record

Document text · Page 18 of 48

Newport News Public Schools Efficiency and Capacity Proposal

Text from the approved public copy. Page numbers follow the PDF sequence.

Open Source Document

This page uses extracted PDF text. Text can misread numbers, dates or table columns. Check the PDF before quoting or interpreting it. Redacted areas remain redacted.

Gaskin and Associates Consulting Group, LLC NNPS proposal October 8 2026 18 Other completed pair screens The available detailed records produce 97 same-level pairs from 20 eligible schools after exclusions. Four meet the aggregate 90% upper ceiling. Most fail the separate three-mile campus-point screen; none is a verified travel or receiving-school solution. [S03; unchanged workbook Capacity screens] Tested pupils transferred to receiver Combined pupils Receiver capacity Use Headroom at 90% Straight-line miles Yates → Newsome Park 855 966 88.5% 14 7.89 B T Washington → Hines 1,279 1,422 89.9% 0 4.51 Hilton → Newsome Park 822 966 85.1% 47 3.24 B T Washington → Crittenden 1,217 1,552 78.4% 179 2.94 Receiver names identify the larger published capacity used in each screen, not an adopted destination. The Crittenden result fits the upper ceiling but is below the 80% lower band; it requires 25 additional pupils to reach 1,242. Hines has no whole-pupil headroom under the ceiling. Neither result establishes grade, course or staffed capacity. Nearby pairs that do not fit Pair Combined pupils Larger capacity Pupils above 90% ceiling Straight-line miles Hines and Crittenden 1,632 1,552 236 1.6 Greenwood and Richneck 982 922 153 1.4 Newsome Park and Discovery 942 966 73 1.4 These examples show why proximity and low utilization at one school are insufficient. The larger published building does not hold both cohorts within the planning ceiling. A distributed alternative, such as the southeast two-receiver tests, changes the calculation and the possible burdens. Coverage can change the option set Eighteen study schools lack matched current detailed capacity records. Additional receivers, room/program constraints and student origins may change the feasible alternatives. The campus maps in Appendix B show locations and program hosts; they do not show proposed attendance zones, road-connected service areas, crossings or pupil origins.
Jump to an indexed page (48 of 48)

Report a privacy or text-extraction issue through publication requests.