This page uses extracted PDF text. Text can misread numbers, dates or table columns. Check the PDF before quoting or interpreting it. Redacted areas remain redacted.
Gaskin and Associates Consulting Group, LLC
Discovery STEM proposal
October 8 2026
21
Appendix A Historical chronology
Record dates describe historical activity. They do not establish unchanged conditions today. CFS times are logged event or
receipt times, not necessarily the duration of exposure.
Date
Record
Documented event
March 3 2022
R02 pp. 107-110
Property-damage CFS at the school address; associated
collision facts require review.
September 29 2023
R02 pp. 66-69
4:51 p.m. reckless-driving allegation; gone-on-arrival
disposition.
October 9 2023
R02 pp. 50-55
9:12 a.m. property-damage CFS; no route-causation finding.
October 17 2023
R01 / R00 p. 7
Visible school-associated warning about speed, distraction
and cross-street drop-off.
October-December
2023
R02 / Appendix B
Repeated morning traffic-control records, including child-
crossing support.
January 18 2024
R02 pp. 1-3
3:48 p.m. afternoon traffic-control field event.
June 24 2024
R08 p. 23
Most recent crisis-plan review/update date reported in the
supplied survey.
November 7 2024
R00 p. 9 / R09
Date attributed to the Oak Avenue recommendation; original
readable study remains unverified.
November 13 2024
R02 pp. 10-12
3:57 p.m. property-damage entry canceled as duplicate;
linked event needs reconciliation.
November 19 2024
R03 p. 1
Sign work initiated; added-crosswalk comment and restriping
request recorded.
November 22-25 2024
R04-R05
Recorded 16th and 17th/Chestnut marking work and
completion comments.
January 10-15 2025
R03
Recorded sign replacement and installation.
February 10 2025
R02 pp. 4-6
9:09 a.m. traffic-control event; does not demonstrate
engineering work failed.
March 11 / April 1
2025
R07
Gaskin escalation and city reply reporting no intended internal
route change then.
The survey introduction states that submission partially fulfills the statutory audit requirement. The visible traffic-control
checkbox in Q5.8 is empty. Neither that option nor any redacted response is treated as a selected SRO benefit. [R08, pp. 1,
5]Jump to an indexed page (28 of 28)