This page uses extracted PDF text. Text can misread numbers, dates or table columns. Check the PDF before quoting or interpreting it. Redacted areas remain redacted.
Responsible Entity Responsible Entity Type Role Geographic
Area Served
public services
Multiple Non-profit Housing CHDO Ownership Jurisdiction
Organizations Rental
Private Banks and Mortgage Private Industry Economic Jurisdiction
Companies Development
Ownership
Rental
Local Companies Private Industry Economic Jurisdiction
Development
Homelessness
Ownership
Local Churches Community/Faith-based Homelessness Jurisdiction
organization Non-homeless
special needs
Table 56 - Institutional Delivery Structure
Assess of Strengths and Gaps in the Institutional Delivery System
The City continues to add to its institutional delivery system over the years and made significant strides
within the last 5-7 years. The Mayors and Chairs Commission has focused on homeless issues and several
cities and private companies continue to commit financial resources. It has allowed multi- jurisdictional
collaboration.
Some of the gaps that still exist are a lack of affordable housing, a lack of transitional housing for persons
leaving institutions and shelters and long waiting lists for public and assisted housing eligible persons.
86Jump to an indexed page (228 of 228)