INDEPENDENT LOCAL NEWSNewport News, Virginia
Back to the record

Document text · Page 14 of 26

NNPS - Pre-Child Study and Child Study Process Handbook

Text from the approved public copy. Page numbers follow the PDF sequence.

Open Source Document

Document page

Page options

This page uses extracted PDF text. Text can misread numbers, dates or table columns. Check the PDF before quoting or interpreting it. Redacted areas remain redacted.

2. Develop a plan Once the problem is defined, a specific plan of action must be designed to address the problem. The Child Study Action Plan (CS-3) will be completed during the child study committee meeting. The action plan must: • Be specific. • Have clearly defined goals and desired outcomes. For example, “By January 31, John will be able to correctly name the sounds of 20 letters.” • State what data will be used for progress monitoring. It is important for the child study committee to develop a Child Study Action Plan that uses different practices and materials than those previously used with the student. Given the problem and hypotheses, the team should brainstorm possible interventions and strategies. The committee should evaluate alternatives and act on the following: • Select interventions for implementation. What materials will be used? What specific methods, strategies, or best practices will be used? • Who will serve as the interventionist to implement the intervention/ strategy: teacher, tutor, assistant, specialists, etc? • In what setting will the plan be implemented (classroom, pull-out program)? • What time of day will the plan be implemented (during the day, before/after school)? How long will the plan be in place (5 weeks, 8 weeks)? Step 2 Common Pitfalls Guiding Questions • Goal is vague, not in behavioral terms • Would we have the goal if we reversed • Setting a goal by stating absence of the description of the problem? behavior • What are the replacement behaviors we would like to substitute for the problem behavior? • Evaluation of ideas as they are generated • Limiting suggestions to what is currently in place • Tendency to see a specific place or person as an intervention • Selecting interventions that are unrelated to the hypothesized reason for the problem • Giving referring teacher sole responsibility for implementing interventions • Let’s just list ideas now and evaluate later • If we could do anything, what intervention would we design? • Is that an intervention, or a place where an intervention occurs? • Will that intervention address the cause of the problem? • How can we share responsibility for implementation? • Who will implement the intervention? • What method and materials will be used? • When and how often will the intervention occur? • Where will the intervention occur? • Who will support the teacher as he/she continues to instruct the child? 14
Jump to an indexed page (26 of 26)

Report a privacy or text-extraction issue through Contact & Corrections.