This page uses extracted PDF text. Text can misread numbers, dates or table columns. Check the PDF before quoting or interpreting it. Redacted areas remain redacted.
officials to determine an effective manner for disseminating the notice of allocation to appropriate private
school officials.
Object Codes
(OMEGA)
Online Management of Education Grant Awards:
Four-digit alphanumeric code that defines the type of a financial transaction. OC1000 – Personal Services;
OC2000 – Employee Benefits; OC3000 – Purchased/Contractual Services; OC4000 - Internal Services; OC5000
- Other Charges; OC6000 - Materials and Supplies; OC8000 – Capital Outlay
OESE
Office of Elementary & Secondary Education
OSQ
Office of School Quality
PAR
Personnel Activity Report
PDSA
Plan, Do, Study, Act Process (Continuous Improvement)
Persistently
lowest-
achieving
schools:
As determined by the State, consistent with the requirements of the School Improvement Grants program
authorized by section 1003(g) of the ESEA,
Any Title I school in improvement, corrective action, or restructuring that (a) Is among the lowest-achieving
five percent of Title I schools in improvement, corrective action, or restructuring or the lowest-achieving five
Title I schools in improvement, corrective action, or restructuring in the State, whichever number of schools
is greater; or (b) Is a high school that has had a graduation rate as defined in 34 CFR 200.19(b) that is less
than 60 percent over a number of years; and
Any secondary school that is eligible for, but does not receive, Title I funds that (a) Is among the lowest-
achieving five percent of secondary schools or the lowest-achieving five secondary schools in the State that
are eligible for, but do not receive, Title I funds, whichever number of schools is greater; or (b) Is a high
school that has had a graduation rate as defined in 34 CFR 200.19(b) that is less than 60 percent over a
number of years.
To identify the lowest-achieving schools, a State must take into account both (i) The academic achievement
of the "all students" group in a school in terms of proficiency on the State's assessments under section
1111(b)(3) of the ESEA in reading/language arts and mathematics combined; and (ii) The school's lack of
progress on those assessments over a number of years in the "all students" group.
Personalized
learning plan:
A formal document, available in digital and other formats both in and out of school to students, parents, and
teachers, that, at a minimum: establishes student learning goals based on academic and career objectives
and personal interests; sequences content and skill development to achieve those learning goals and ensure
that a student can graduate on-time college- and career-ready; and is updated based on information about
student performance on a variety of activities and assessments that indicate progress towards goals.
PEL
Potential English Learner
Research-based
There are theories behind it, but that the theories are not always proven true. There is no evidence in the
research proving efficacy. (Also see evidence based)
Performance
Levels
Performance on each school-quality indicator is rated at one of three levels:
LEVEL ONE: At or Above Standard
•
Performance at or above state standard for indicator
•
Sufficient improvement toward state standard for indicator from Level Two
LEVEL TWO: Near Standard or Improving
•
Below state standard for indicator but approaching Level One performance
•
Sufficient improvement on indicator from Level Three
LEVEL THREE: Below Standard
•
Performance on indicator below state standard
•
Performance on indicator at Level Two for more than four consecutive years
School in
Improvement
Schools that have any school quality indicators rated at a Level Three and/or is federally identified
as ATSI, CSI, or TSI.
SEA
State Education Agency
SIG
School Improvement Grant
To the TOP
17Jump to an indexed page (21 of 21)