INDEPENDENT LOCAL NEWSNewport News, Virginia
Back to the record

Document text · Page 8 of 88

Coal dust and wind fence — Computational Fluid Dynamics study

Text from the approved public copy. Page numbers follow the PDF sequence.

Open Source Document

This page uses extracted PDF text. Text can misread numbers, dates or table columns. Check the PDF before quoting or interpreting it. Redacted areas remain redacted.

8 Shaping the Solution To develop an effective mitigation strategy, the CFD study focused on designing and positioning a wind fence to minimize fugitive dust emissions from the coal stockpiles at Dominion Terminal Associates (DTA) and Kinder Morgan Bulk Terminals (Piers IX & X). The placement and configuration of the wind fence were guided primarily by site-specific meteorological data, particularly the wind rose at Dominion Terminal (on site), alongside the terminals' geometry and the locations of the areas most impacted by dust. Analysis of the wind rose for the Hampton Roads/Newport News area revealed that the predominant wind direction is from the southwest (SW), with a significant secondary component from the south-southeast (SSE) and a tertiary contribution from the west-northwest (WNW). These directions align with regional coastal and bay-influenced patterns, where SW winds are most frequent and often strongest, especially during transitional seasons, while SSE and WNW flows contribute to episodic dust transport events. Primary consideration (SW winds): These blow from the southwest toward the northeast, directing potential dust plumes from the stockpiles across the terminals and toward residential areas to the northeast and east of the facilities. Secondary (SSE winds): Winds from the south-southeast push dust northward/northwestward, potentially impacting communities directly north of the terminals. Tertiary (WNW winds): Winds from the west-northwest could carry dust southward, affecting port areas and any sensitive receptors to the south of the terminals. NE winds (minor mode) primarily direct dust over the James River and were not modeled as they pose negligible community impact Given the terminals' waterfront location along the James River (with stockpiles generally oriented along the shoreline and open yard areas), the wind fence design prioritized blocking or redirecting the most frequent and impactful wind directions while accounting for operational constraints such as rail access, stacker/reclaimer movement, ship loading activities, and vehicle/equipment pathways to the best of our ability. Figure 1 (Google Earth View of Area with Wind Rose)
Jump to an indexed page (88 of 88)

Report a privacy or text-extraction issue through publication requests.