INDEPENDENT LOCAL NEWSNewport News, Virginia
Back to the record

Document text · Page 15 of 88

Coal dust and wind fence — Computational Fluid Dynamics study

Text from the approved public copy. Page numbers follow the PDF sequence.

Open Source Document

This page uses extracted PDF text. Text can misread numbers, dates or table columns. Check the PDF before quoting or interpreting it. Redacted areas remain redacted.

15 Particle Generation Particle generation (entrainment or erosion) on a coal stockpile occurs when aerodynamic forces from wind exceed the resisting forces (gravity, inter-particle cohesion, and moisture effects) holding particles in place. This is governed by the surface friction velocity (derived from shear stress = , where is air density). Erosion begins when surpasses the particle-specific threshold friction velocity , which depends on particle diameter, density, shape, and surface moisture. The CFD assumes wind-driven erosion only. Mechanical activities (stacker/reclaimers at 5,900 tph, bulldozers) generate dust independent of wind threshold. Wind fences still provide benefit by reducing transport of mechanically generated dust. Wind load contributes through: Mean dynamic pressure ( ) and local acceleration of flow over the stockpile’s windward slope (often triangular or conical geometry). Turbulent fluctuations in pressure and velocity, which impart lift and drag on surface particles. Surface shear stress peaks on the windward face and crest due to flow impingement and separation. For coal (similar to granular materials like sand), generation is intermittent and strongest on exposed and contribute to fugitive dust emissions. Dust movement after generation follows three classic modes (observed via flow visualization in wind- tunnel studies of triangular piles): Surface creep Saltation – accounting for most mass transport. Suspension distances, creating plumes and off-site pollution. On stockpiles, saltation dominates near the surface, while suspension disperses dust downwind. Turbulence intensity amplifies both lift-off and transport. Porous wind fences (typically 30–40% porosity) mitigate these effects by creating a sheltered zone of reduced wind speed and turbulence downstream, without forming large recirculating eddies (which could otherwise increase local erosion). The fence exerts drag on the oncoming flow, lowering mean velocity and in the protected area. It can also physically intercept some saltating or suspended particles. In summary, wind load drives erosion via elevated shear and turbulence on the stockpile; porous wind -50% porosity) lower the effective wind load, raise the erosion threshold, suppress particle generation, and reduce dust transport—yielding substantial emission cuts. These findings have informed practical designs at coal facilities worldwide. Actual performance also depends on local wind roses, pile shape, moisture, and fence height/orientation relative to the dominant wind. The CFD study looks how porous wind fences (or windbreaks) influence the dispersion and emission of fugitive dust from coal stockpiles or open storage areas at a terminal, with a specific focus on two particle size classes: (often approximating PM10, respirable/inhalable fraction) and (coarser particles more prone to saltation and short-range settling).
Jump to an indexed page (88 of 88)

Report a privacy or text-extraction issue through publication requests.