INDEPENDENT LOCAL NEWSNewport News, Virginia
Back to the record

Document text · Page 2 of 13

Cline v. Riley — Court of Appeals opinion, 1099-25-1

Text from the approved public copy. Page numbers follow the PDF sequence.

Open Source Document

This page uses extracted PDF text. Text can misread numbers, dates or table columns. Check the PDF before quoting or interpreting it. Redacted areas remain redacted.

- 2 - superseding findings of probable cause during the course of the prosecution and therefore constituted a prohibited ruling on a plea to the general issue. For the following reasons, we disagree with Cline’s argument and affirm the circuit court. BACKGROUND I. The Underlying Prosecution On June 7, 2018, L.C.1 initially reported to the Williamsburg Police Department that Cline, a daycare provider, and R.J., a Newport News police officer,2 sexually abused her when she was a child, around 2008 or 2009. Based on these allegations, appellee Officer Kathryn Riley from the Newport News Police Department investigated L.C.’s claims and subsequently sought warrants against Cline and R.J. On March 29, 2019, a magistrate issued eight felony warrants against Cline.3 In April 2019, a special prosecutor from the Chesapeake Commonwealth’s Attorney’s Office was appointed because of R.J.’s employment by the Newport News Police Department. On October 4, 2019, the special prosecutor presented the case at a preliminary hearing in the juvenile and domestic relations district court (the JDR court). L.C. testified at the preliminary hearing and underwent cross-examination by Cline’s and R.J.’s counsel. Counsel questioned L.C. on her recurring mental health issues and sexual assault allegations she had made in the past. In response to Cline’s argument that L.C. dishonestly pursued these charges against her, the JDR court responded that it was “not prepared to say that as a matter of law [L.C.’s] 1 We use initials to protect the complainant’s identity. 2 We use initials because he is not party to this appeal. 3 Cline was charged with: two counts of aggravated sexual battery of a child under the age of 13 (Code § 18.2-67.3); three counts of taking indecent liberties with a child under the age of 15 (Code § 18.2-370); two counts of inanimate object sexual penetration of a child under the age of 13 (Code § 18.2-67.2); and one count of carnal knowledge of a child of 13 years of age (Code § 18.2-63).
Jump to an indexed page (13 of 13)

Report a privacy or text-extraction issue through publication requests.