INDEPENDENT LOCAL NEWSNewport News, Virginia
Back to the record

Document text · Page 13 of 13

Cline v. Riley — Court of Appeals opinion, 1099-25-1

Text from the approved public copy. Page numbers follow the PDF sequence.

Open Source Document

This page uses extracted PDF text. Text can misread numbers, dates or table columns. Check the PDF before quoting or interpreting it. Redacted areas remain redacted.

- 13 - First, “[a] demurrer tests the legal sufficiency of facts alleged in pleadings, not the strength of proof. We accept as true all facts properly pleaded in the . . . complaint and all reasonable and fair inferences that may be drawn from those facts.” Lewis v. Kei, 281 Va. 715, 719 (2011) (alterations in original) (quoting Glazebrook v. Bd. of Supervisors of Spotsylvania Cnty., 266 Va. 550, 554 (2003)). On the other hand, a plea in bar “does not point out the legal insufficiency of allegations[,] but rather demonstrates their irrelevance because of some other dispositive point—usually some affirmative defense[.]” Cal. Condo. Ass’n, 301 Va. at 20 (citation omitted). In order to do so, pleaders must present new evidence. 1 Friend, supra, § 8.01-4. There is a distinction between a demurrer and a plea in bar; a demurrer invokes a pleading standard while a plea in bar invokes an evidentiary standard. Here, the circuit court found that, on its face, Cline’s complaint adequately pled malicious prosecution, which led it to overrule Officer Riley’s demurrer. However, the circuit court found that appellees presented sufficient evidence—the exhibits attached to their responsive motions—to succeed on their defense of intervening and superseding findings of probable cause, operating as a bar to the malicious prosecution claims. In finding so, it granted Officer Riley’s plea in bar. These procedural outcomes are not inconsistent. Therefore, it was not error for the circuit court to both overrule the demurrer and grant the plea in bar.13 CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the judgment of the circuit court. Affirmed. 13 Accordingly, because the circuit court correctly granted appellees’ pleas in bar and correctly dismissed Cline’s complaint, we do not address Cline’s argument challenging the circuit court’s sustaining Chief Drew’s demurrer nor Officer Riley’s argument challenging the circuit court’s overruling her demurrer.
Jump to an indexed page (13 of 13)

Report a privacy or text-extraction issue through publication requests.