INDEPENDENT LOCAL NEWSNewport News, Virginia
Back to the record

Document text · Page 8 of 25

Chisholm v. Commonwealth — Court of Appeals opinion, Record 1830-24-1

Text from the approved public copy. Page numbers follow the PDF sequence.

Open Source Document

This page uses extracted PDF text. Text can misread numbers, dates or table columns. Check the PDF before quoting or interpreting it. Redacted areas remain redacted.

However, “[t]he [F]ourth [A]mendment does not proscribe all seizures, only those that are ‘unreasonable.’” Hodnett v. Commonwealth, 32 Va. App. 684, 690 (2000) (second and third alterations in original) (quoting Welshman v. Commonwealth, 28 Va. App. 20, 30 (1998) (en banc)). “Moreover, ‘even when officers have no basis for suspecting a particular individual, they may generally ask questions of that individual . . . and request consent to search[,] as long as the police do not convey a message that compliance with their requests is required.’” Londono v. Commonwealth, 40 Va. App. 377, 399 (2003) (alterations in original) (quoting Florida v. Bostick, 501 U.S. 429, 434-35 (1991)). “Police officers do not violate the Fourth Amendment when they stop and question an individual if they have reasonable articulable suspicion that the person is engaged in criminal activity or when the person’s encounter with the police is consensual.” Harris v. Commonwealth, 266 Va. 28, 32 (2003) (citation omitted). “Fourth Amendment scrutiny is triggered, however, the moment an encounter ‘loses its consensual nature.’” Roulhac v. Commonwealth, 50 Va. App. 8, 15 (2007) (quoting Payne v. Commonwealth, 14 Va. App. 86, 88 (1992)). Under the Fourth Amendment, “a person is ‘seized’ only when, by means of physical force or a show of authority, his freedom of movement is restrained.” United States v. Mendenhall, 446 U.S. 544, 553 (1980). “In essence, ‘[w]hether a seizure has occurred for Fourth Amendment purposes depends upon whether, under a totality of the circumstances, a reasonable person would have believed that he or she was not free to leave.’” Brown v. City of Danville, 44 Va. App. 586, 603 (2004) (alteration in original) (quoting McGee v. Commonwealth, 25 Va. App. 193, 199-200 (1997) (en banc)). According to Virginia law, when determining whether a reasonable person would feel free to leave an encounter with the police, there are several factors to consider. Harris, 266 Va. at 32. -8-
Jump to an indexed page (25 of 25)

Report a privacy or text-extraction issue through publication requests.