INDEPENDENT LOCAL NEWSNewport News, Virginia
Back to the record

Document text · Page 21 of 25

Chisholm v. Commonwealth — Court of Appeals opinion, Record 1830-24-1

Text from the approved public copy. Page numbers follow the PDF sequence.

Open Source Document

This page uses extracted PDF text. Text can misread numbers, dates or table columns. Check the PDF before quoting or interpreting it. Redacted areas remain redacted.

1998) (quoting Wood, 106 F.3d at 948). Therefore, “absent signs of nervousness beyond the norm, we will discount the detaining officer’s reliance on the detainee’s nervousness as a basis for reasonable suspicion.” Id. Courts have defined “unusually nervous behavior” as “shaking hands, heavy breathing, and providing inconsistent answers.” Massenburg, 654 F.3d at 490 (quoting United States v. Mayo, 361 F.3d 802, 806 (4th Cir. 2004)). Here, the record reflects none of those hallmarks. Chisholm did not exhibit shaking hands, heavy breathing, or provide inconsistent answers. Although his breathing rate may have changed during the encounter, such a reaction is common when interacting with police and does not suggest that a person has engaged in, or is about to engage in, criminal activity. Accordingly, the generic signs of nervousness the Commonwealth relied upon add little, if any, weight to the reasonable suspicion analysis. When reviewing reasonable suspicion, we must evaluate based on common sense because “[t]he touchstone of the Fourth Amendment is reasonableness.” Florida v. Jimeno, 500 U.S. 248, 250 (1991). Likewise, the Commonwealth’s reliance on categorizing Chisholm slowly walking several steps backwards as indicative of evasive, pre-flight behavior, is not supported by the record and rests on mere speculation. As such, the Commonwealth’s characterization of the defendant’s conduct as “pre-flight” or “evasive” is unsupported by common sense inferences required under Fourth Amendment analysis. At the time of the encounter, the defendant was carrying a gallon of milk in one hand and was facing two officers directly in front of him, with another officer positioned behind him. Accordingly, Chisholm was surrounded by three armed officers and was not reasonably capable of fleeing. Moreover, one of the officers informed Chisholm that he was “backing up into [his] partner” and then was immediately grabbed and detained by Officer McLaughlin. Most - 21 -
Jump to an indexed page (25 of 25)

Report a privacy or text-extraction issue through publication requests.