This page uses extracted PDF text. Text can misread numbers, dates or table columns. Check the PDF before quoting or interpreting it. Redacted areas remain redacted.
- 12 -
whatever subsequent consent Knight-Walker may have given was tainted by the illegality, it was
invalidated and we need not address this assignment of error further. Therefore, we find that the
trial court erred when it denied Knight-Walker’s motion to suppress the evidence seized as a
result of that search.
III. CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, given the specific facts of this particular case, we reverse the
decision of the trial court denying the motion to suppress, and we remand to the trial court for
further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Reversed and remanded. Jump to an indexed page (23 of 23)