This page uses extracted PDF text. Text can misread numbers, dates or table columns. Check the PDF before quoting or interpreting it. Redacted areas remain redacted.
- 13 -
the circuit court’s additional holding that there was no longer a pleading to be amended because
the court had already dismissed Adams’ complaint.6 See Allegheny Constr. Co. v. Town of
Christiansburg, 86 Va. App. 321, 347 (2025) (explaining that leave to amend ought not be
granted where the proffered amendments are legally futile).
CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, the circuit court’s judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
6 But see AGCS Marine Ins. Co., 293 Va. at 486 (noting that a motion for leave to amend
is not mooted by dismissal of the complaint). Jump to an indexed page (13 of 13)