Public Records

Visible header April 16, 2025, 12:03 p.m. First-page excerpt of a five-page email chain; quoted pages 2–5 omitted and child-specific details removed. A promise to work on accommodations is not proof of implementation, unrestricted access or withdrawal of the restriction. Publication copy with permanent redactions; original source retained privately.

File: dsa-2025-04-16-accommodation-clarification.pdf

Visible header April 16, 2025, 11:58 a.m. First-page excerpt of a five-page email chain; quoted pages 2–5 omitted and family details removed. The legal and conduct assertions are Spratley’s position, not court findings or proof that the review occurred. Publication copy with permanent redactions; original source retained privately.

File: dsa-2025-04-16-rationale-response.pdf

December 15, 11:46 a.m. An inquiry during the search, not a final no-records determination. Publication copy with permanent redactions; original source retained privately.

File: dsa-2025-12-15-spratley-inquiry-1146.pdf

December 15, noon. A promise to send information does not by itself establish that it was delivered or the release was complete. Publication copy with permanent redactions; original source retained privately.

File: dsa-2025-12-15-spratley-response-1200.pdf

December 15, 11:57 a.m. The City-specific statement does not establish that no request was made to NNPS. Publication copy with permanent redactions; original source retained privately.

File: dsa-2025-12-15-spratley-scope-1157.pdf

Visible header March 11, 2026, 10:25 a.m.; request P 014786-031126. The response identifies a three-page call-for-service report, two-page criminal-citation report and two video segments. It does not supply those underlying records or establish a court outcome. Publication copy with permanent redactions; original source retained privately.

File: dsa-2026-police-records-withholding.pdf

Court-provided release dated May 26, 2026; all 30 original pages retained. Publication redactions remove driver-license number and state fields on original pages 19 and 27, consistent with the clerk’s July 27 correspondence asking that driver-license numbers not be published. Existing agency identity redactions are retained. The public PDF was rebuilt from the redacted page pixels so hidden original scans cannot expose the removed fields. Private original retained separately. Draft APA material remains marked DRAFT. The clerk’s corrective-action statements are attributed to the office and do not independently establish that every correction was verified. Related records include the response-letter excerpt and the published APA report.

File: Circuit-Court-APA-Corrective-Action-Release-Redacted.pdf

Disclosure supplied in the project’s records collection. Signed and dated May 12, 2026; identifies his City communications role and Foundation board relationship. The disclosure states the signer’s position and is not an independent legal determination of a conflict. Publication copy; private contact details removed where present. Original retained separately.

File: brint-martin-pwf-disclosure-public.pdf

May 19, 2026 Clerk email responding to the May 14 request. Includes the office’s $54.06 estimate; the response letter is cataloged separately. Requester statements remain attributed to the requester. Publication copy; private contact details removed where present. Original retained separately.

File: clerk-apa-fee-correspondence-public.pdf

Email chain held by Audit Newport News includes May–July 2026 exchanges and the Clerk’s July 27 privacy reply, as dated in the rendered email header. This correspondence contains no published case-level financial attachments or driver-license numbers. Publication copy; private contact details removed where present. Original retained separately.

File: clerk-apa-release-privacy-followup-public.pdf

Response from Angela F. Reason’s Clerk’s Office to the May 14, 2026 records request. Publication excerpt: original pages 1–2 of a 30-page release. The complete packet is now available as a separate redacted public record, including the attachments and case financials. The letter describes the office’s position; it does not independently verify all corrections. Publication copy; original retained separately.

File: clerk-apa-response-2026-public.pdf

Disclosure supplied in the project’s records collection. Signed and dated May 12, 2026; describes prior Foundation board service from 2020–2023 and her City cultural-arts role. The disclosure states the signer’s position and is not an independent legal determination of a conflict. Publication copy; private contact details removed where present. Original retained separately.

File: joanne-palmeira-pwf-disclosure-public.pdf

Disclosure supplied in the project’s records collection. Signed copy with the date line blank; identifies his City innovation-program role and Foundation board relationship. The disclosure states the signer’s position and is not an independent legal determination of a conflict. Publication copy; private contact details removed where present. Original retained separately.

File: marlin-mcdaniel-pwf-disclosure-public.pdf

LaDonna K. Seely’s March 24, 2025 response is reproduced in a forwarded email chain. The City states that the School Board owns the building and reports no responsive lease or posted-entry regulations in its search. Later requester comments and requests are included and remain attributed to the requester. Publication copy; private contact details removed where present. Original retained separately.

File: seely-administration-building-2025-public.pdf

May 2026 correspondence held by Audit Newport News. The May 19 exchange corrects the initial custodian referral and identifies the Voter Registrar and Treasurer. The request’s transaction description is attributed to the requester; the reply does not establish a campaign-finance violation. Publication copy; private contact details removed where present. Original retained separately.

File: seely-campaign-records-routing-2026-public.pdf

City response dated July 29, 2026 in the rendered email header, responding to the July 28 request. Statements about available records and apparent moderation activity are the City’s response, not verification of every action. The published social-media policy is separately cataloged. Publication copy; private contact details removed where present. Original retained separately.

File: seely-city-social-media-response-2026-public.pdf

Agency and requester correspondence on April 4, 2025; top Spratley reply is dated in the rendered email header. This is a response chain, not the safety audit itself. A separate entry records the April 17 arrangement for review of a redacted audit. Requester assertions remain attributed to the requester. Publication copy; private contact details removed where present. Original retained separately.

File: seely-discovery-safety-audit-2025-public.pdf

City response dated July 27, 2026 in the rendered email header. The body identifies a July 9 request; the reference number includes July 13. Seely reports category-specific search results and directs retrieval of existing records from the request portal. Portal attachments are not embedded in this PDF. Requester allegations are not independently verified findings. Publication copy; private contact details removed where present. Original retained separately.

File: seely-eley-social-media-response-2026-public.pdf

Spratley reply dated April 17, 2025 in the rendered email header. The agency discusses excluding vulnerability-assessment components and cites its statutory basis. This reply does not contain the audit or establish that a review occurred. Publication copy; private contact details removed where present. Original retained separately.

File: spratley-discovery-safety-review-public.pdf

GovQA request G016010-050826; status: Full Release; created 5/7/2026 8:00:00 AM; closed 5/21/2026 12:05:00 PM; assigned to City Attorney's Office. Checked October 1, 2026. Listed documents: SKM_C750i24012411550.pdf; SKM_C750i24012412010.pdf. Listing metadata only: attachment contents were not reviewed or archived in this import. Request and filename dates do not establish a document date or current employment. Email-format files omitted.