INDEPENDENT LOCAL NEWSNewport News, Virginia

Active · Investigation · Reviewed November 12, 2026

Dominion large-load electricity costs: data centers and the grid

Overview

An SCC order reduced a projected residential transmission increase and directed additional filings on direct-connect costs. Local feasibility records identify possible Newport News sites. Actual project cost allocation and rate treatment remain open.

Background & source notes

Follow the July 31 SCC order, the PUR-2026-00131 proceedings and tariffs used to allocate transmission and extension costs. Compare residential Rider T1, direct-connect obligations and the line-extension revenue allowance. Keep the dated Dozier and Carleton planning and utility contacts in view when testing whether any specific project advanced or received a cost allocation.

Source notes and limitations

A projected change, the existing tariff component, systemwide investment plans and the price of a particular connection measure different things. A site discussion, industrial rezoning or feasibility request does not establish a permitted data center, a signed connection or a subsidy. The reviewed October company filing describes its coordination position.

Case details

Page options

Where things stand

Updated

Reviewed finding

Transmission tariff amounts and political disclosures have independent accounting trails

November 12, 2026

The filed Rider T1 rate supplies a $12.73 transmission component for 1,000 kWh on the stated Schedule 1 example. The SCC’s $0.94 projected change uses a different comparison, against the prior approved charge. Lobbying filings and the company’s internal policy identify reported political activity and records to seek. A City bill comparison should use the same meter, usage, tariff and billing period, while any assertion about recovery of a specific expense requires the utility account and approved rate treatment for that expense.

Open question

Which Newport News projects create additional Dominion demand?

A project crosswalk identifying the City AI room, City Hall data-center relocation, Jefferson Lab facilities and any commercial proposal; load estimates, service applications, executed development agreements, incentive approvals and utility cost-allocation terms for each.

View all 3 open questions

Timeline 22

Dates follow the cited records; document dates are labeled separately.

  1. August 4, 2025

    A staff work list names an earlier data-center correspondence package

    Mallory Butler’s work list includes a Data Center Correspondence Package with Derek under reports for executive management and EDA/IDA. This places a staff task before the September donation and easement sequence. It does not supply the package, identify a Dominion instruction or prove that any later action resulted from campaign funding.

  2. August 8, 2025

    A draft property list considers Dozier data-center uses; an email asks about excluding its promotion

    The draft Dozier row names industrial/data-center development and a tentative RFP after site assemblage and control. Butler’s email asks for confirmation that all properties except Dozier should be promoted with EDGE. The draft and question establish a planning stage, not a final exclusion, issued RFP or approval.

  3. August 13–20, 2025

    City staff asks Dominion’s data-center team about site power and feasibility

    Butler reports a rapid SWOT task and seeks Dominion’s process, timing and fees. Bryan Smith introduces the City team to Dominion’s data-center practice. On August 18, Wiseman recommends a no-cost High-Level Feasibility Study for 165 Yorktown Road and 100 Dozier Road, typically taking four to six weeks. Butler says the City will request studies soon. The thread supplies no actual submission or completed result, capacity reservation or campaign-related condition.

  4. September 5, 2025; minutes approved October 3

    EDA/IDA hears a data-center presentation about utilities and faster permitting

    The approved minutes attribute Council interest in data centers and potential tax revenue to Florence Kingston. VEDP’s Vince Barnett presents utility partnerships, zoning and fast-track permitting as ways to attract investment. The slides recommend permit advocates at senior local-government levels. These are attributed statements and recommendations; no reviewed record establishes that Council adopted the recommendations or Dominion requested them.

  5. September 22, 2025 — 6:21–8:15 p.m. EDT

    Jones requests data-center materials and acknowledges Archer’s briefing

    At 6:21:54 p.m., Archer sends a City white paper, JLARC/VEDP materials and Carleton/Dozier maps to Jones, describing them as supplied at his request. Joy-Hogg, Kingston, Hollingsworth and Conatser are copied. At 8:15:01 p.m., Jones thanks staff and says he will review the material that week. These times are converted from the original UTC headers; both messages fall on September 22 locally. The briefing precedes the September 23 York County easement vote and PAC receipt date, but contains no contribution-for-action agreement.

  6. October 1–2, 2025 — draft speaking notes

    EDGE draft notes identify Carleton and Dozier as potential data-center candidates

    Perry circulates draft talking points late October 1 for the October 2 Summit. The selected Lee Hall section names both properties as potential data-center candidates and describes other industrial or energy uses. This supplies later prepared marketing language, following the August exclusion question; it does not establish the final spoken wording, a selected developer or confirmed utility capacity.

  7. October 14, 2025

    City staff circulates a Dozier Road energy-site draft for edits

    Brittany Thompson asks development staff for edits to the HR Alliance Dozier Road RFI. The attachment identifies 19.35 EDA-controlled acres for an energy-production/storage inquiry. Nearby Dominion infrastructure and a possible substation are described as options requiring further coordination, utility confirmation and load assessment. The internal draft is distinct from a final submission, service commitment, data-center approval or the September York County easement.

  8. November 25, 2025

    Final rate order quantifies a residential increase for 2026

    The SCC approves less revenue than Dominion requested and illustrates an $11.24 monthly increase for a residential customer using 1,000 kWh in 2026, plus $2.36 in 2027. It sets a 9.8% return on equity rather than the requested 10.4%. Actual bills also depend on usage, other charges and the applicable dates; this is not a traced political expense.

  9. December 12, 2025; minutes approved January 9, 2026

    EDA/IDA hears SIR digital-infrastructure advice after staff engagement

    Approved minutes record John Martin’s presentation and Kingston’s statement that staff engaged SIR. She acknowledges the need for public information. This establishes a documented planning step, not a utility study result or project award.

  10. February 17, 2026

    Both senators support a cost-allocation proposal

    The Senate passed SB 339, 40–0. Vote SV505 records both Locke (S0067) and Diggs (S0119) voting yes. The House committee continued the bill to the next session on March 5; Senate passage was not enactment.

  11. April 1-28, 2026

    Carleton review distinguishes industrial rezoning from data-center permission

    April 1 planning minutes record staff saying data centers were not then allowed. Ordinance 8156-26 records April 28 adoption of light-industrial rezoning for 165 and 185 Yorktown Road. This narrows what the earlier inquiry and marketing can establish; a data-center approval is not shown.

  12. May 14, 2026

    SB 253 becomes chapter 1124

    The enacted law addresses weatherization, underground-line cost recovery, high-load cost allocation and deferred-fuel financing. Clause 3 directs protection against high-load customer subsidies; clause 5 permits a financing petition subject to SCC review. A multi-part law should not be reduced to a single pro- or anti-Dominion label.

  13. June 26-August 14, 2026

    SCALE grant and Dominion’s declared commercial interest are publicly described

    DHCD announces $154,391 for SCALE. DEIC later names Dominion and SEFC as partners; Dominion’s Nate Frost describes supplier access, communicating purchasing needs and finding technologies. This is a declared business interest in a separate regional program, not a traced benefit bought with campaign money.

  14. July 31, 2026

    A specific cost-allocation dispute reaches a final order

    The adopted methodology reduces the projected residential Rider T1 increase from $2.90 to $0.94 per month at 1,000 kWh. Dominion supported that methodology but argued for letting existing protections mature before additional direct-assignment changes. The SCC directs a proposed mandatory contribution policy for defined direct-connect facilities, net of a transmission-revenue credit. Higher-order grid costs require further consideration. No campaign contribution is identified as a condition of either position.

  15. August 25, 2026

    SCC opens the docket for transmission-policy and coordination filings

    The Commission establishes PUR-2026-00131 for the filings directed by the July 31 final order. The 90-day proposed-policy and 120-day coordination-update periods run from July 31, not this later docket-opening date. This is a procedural action, not approval of amended terms.

  16. September 29, 2026

    SCC authorizes a specific fuel-cost financing balance

    The SCC order finds $931,851,010, including upfront financing costs and subject to adjustment, eligible for securitization and recovery. It cites the 2026 legislation. The financing balance is distinct from utility profit and from VEPGA’s municipal contract increase.

  17. October 21, 2026 release; reviewed October 27

    Released register reports cumulative spending under SIR’s broader contract

    Row 19132 reports $230,574.42 Expended Total for SIR contract 26-3357-00 and $73,425 in open purchase orders. Row 19205 reports zero expended for 26-3642-01. No reviewed work order attributes those amounts to data-center planning, Dominion or campaign activity.

  18. October 22, 2026 filing; meeting reported as October 19

    Dominion says cooperative coordination is underway and opposes formal reopening

    The company reports an October 19 meeting and argues that a separate coordinating-party order is unnecessary. It anticipates ongoing discussions and later federal agreement amendments. This is its position; the original ODEC motion and any ruling resolving it were not recovered.

  19. 2026 annual report — publication day unverified

    Dominion describes planned investment and the regulated earnings mechanism

    The report plans approximately $55 billion of Virginia capital spending for 2026–2030, net of Stonepeak reimbursements. Data centers represented 28% of Virginia Power’s 2025 electricity sales. It describes regulated returns on service investments while distinguishing fuel-cost recovery. These are territory-wide plans and financial mechanisms, not Newport News spending or evidence of a campaign bargain.

  20. Undated City webpage; checked October 26, 2026

    The City’s current planning statement disclaims a development deal

    The City describes its readiness plan as planning without a developer, agreement or commitment, and says hyperscale facilities are infeasible. That current statement concerns the planning process. Earlier inquiries and marketing drafts do not, by themselves, establish an undisclosed deal or falsify it.

  21. September 1, 2026 usage-effective date; filed August 11

    The filed tariff supplies a concrete residential transmission component

    Rider T1 lists 1.2730 cents per kWh for the named residential schedules. A standard Schedule 1 energy-term example at 1,000 kWh is $12.73. This is the transmission component, not the whole bill, a $12.73 increase, or an identified political-expense charge. The earlier SCC order’s projected $0.94 increase is a different measure. A complete bill and applicable schedule are still needed for an individual customer.

  22. January 1, 2026 effective date; filed December 9, 2025

    Line-extension rule identifies the inputs needed to test project cost sharing

    For the specified new nonresidential/three-phase service, paragraph D.1 sets an upfront payment for covered costs above four times expected annual revenue excluding fuel. Other paragraphs set facility categories and conditions. A project’s actual cost estimate, revenue allowance, classification, agreement and rate treatment are necessary to determine who bears its costs. These general terms are separate from the unrecovered policy proposal required in PUR-2026-00131 and establish no approved Dozier project or political waiver.

Documents 37

37 of 37 reviewed records. Source links, source collections and release indexes are identified separately from archived copies.

  • Meetings & decisionsSource link

    Virginia LIS: 2026 Regular Session roll-call data

    Virginia state agencies · Virginia Legislative Information SystemDocument date: Date not specified

    Official session data used to match bill actions, vote identifiers and coded member votes. The download covers the session, not only this case’s selected bills.

    Source notes

    Official individual CSV download reviewed October 26, 2026; source-only. No publication date is assigned. VOTE.CSV has no header: each row starts with a vote ID followed by member-ID/vote pairs. HISTORY.CSV has named columns. Member identities are separately checked against LIS profiles. Retained source SHA-256: cbf0ae5d4f93dff2304faf511dd5f8e97f2517b9a2de0c6e9938bd0c7d2d74d0.

  • Meetings & decisionsSource link

    Virginia LIS: 2026 Regular Session bill-history data

    Virginia state agencies · Virginia Legislative Information SystemDocument date: Date not specified

    Official session data used to match bill actions, vote identifiers and coded member votes. The download covers the session, not only this case’s selected bills.

    Source notes

    Official individual CSV download reviewed October 26, 2026; source-only. No publication date is assigned. VOTE.CSV has no header: each row starts with a vote ID followed by member-ID/vote pairs. HISTORY.CSV has named columns. Member identities are separately checked against LIS profiles. Retained source SHA-256: 46a19424314bd70a17657f7031b32483428670b237d739ee6bf8762de6cd95c2.

  • OtherSource link

    Virginia LIS: Mamie E. Locke — 2026 member identity

    Virginia state agencies · Virginia General Assembly / SenateDocument date: Date not specified

    Official member identity used to interpret the session’s coded roll-call data.

    Source notes

    Source-only official profile checked October 26, 2026. The member code is S0067. The LIS page title identifies this senator. No profile publication date is assigned; state legislators have separate case-linked state-office profiles and are not classified as City employees.

  • OtherSource link

    Virginia LIS: J.D. “Danny” Diggs — 2026 member identity

    Virginia state agencies · Virginia General Assembly / SenateDocument date: Date not specified

    Official member identity used to interpret the session’s coded roll-call data.

    Source notes

    Source-only official profile checked October 26, 2026. The member code is S0119. The LIS page title identifies this senator. No profile publication date is assigned; state legislators have separate case-linked state-office profiles and are not classified as City employees.

  • Court & legal recordsSource link

    SB 339 (2026): utility cost-allocation proposal and history

    Virginia state agencies · Virginia General AssemblyDocument date: Date not specified

    Bill and official history concerning allocation of transmission, generation and distribution costs associated with high-load customers. Senate passage is distinct from enactment.

    Source notes

    Source-only bill page checked with the 2026 official session bulk files. Senate passage: February 17, vote SV505, 40–0. The House Labor and Commerce history continued it to the next session March 5; it was not enacted in the reviewed 2026 history. No bill-page publication date is assigned.

  • Court & legal recordsArchived file

    2026 Acts chapter 1124 (SB 253): electric-utility rates and cost recovery

    Virginia state agencies · Virginia General AssemblyDocument date: May 14, 2026

    Enacted text includes weatherization funding, underground-line cost recovery, protection against high-load customer cross-subsidies, tariff provisions and authority to seek deferred-fuel financing.

    Source notes & file details

    Complete two-page official session-law PDF. Approved May 14, effective July 1, 2026, as confirmed in official HISTORY.CSV. Clauses 2–5 are distinct provisions; a vote on an earlier conference report or selected recommendations is not a vote on each final clause in isolation.

    File: sb253-2026-chapter1124.pdf

  • Court & legal recordsSource link

    SCC: Dominion deferred-fuel financing order, PUR-2026-00078

    Virginia state agencies · Virginia State Corporation CommissionDocument date: September 29, 2026

    September 29 financing order authorizes securitization and recovery of eligible deferred fuel and financing costs under the statutory process. It connects the 2026 legislation to a specific regulatory proceeding.

    Source notes

    Primary SCC order reproduced as SEC exhibit 99.1. Source-only HTML with printed page numbers. Pages 2, 4 and 7 explain the authority, petition and $931,851,010 eligible balance inclusive of upfront financing costs, subject to adjustment. This is cost recovery, not an equivalent amount of profit or political contributions. Reviewed October 26, 2026.

  • Budget & financeSource link

    Dominion Energy 2025 annual report: Virginia investment and earnings model

    Other public body · Dominion Energy / SEC filingDocument date: Date not specified

    Physical page 20 (printed page 10) describes the Virginia investment plan, data-center demand and how regulated investment returns differ from fuel-cost recovery.

    Why this record matters

    Physical page 20 / printed page 10 is the reviewed passage. Costs recovered for fuel and purchased power are distinguished from investment returns; neither a higher bill nor planned capital spending can simply be labelled profit.

    The business stake: capital investment can earn regulated returns: Dominion’s annual report plans approximately $55 billion of Virginia capital spending for 2026–2030, net of Stonepeak reimbursements, and identifies data centers as 28% of Virginia Power’s 2025 electricity sales. It explains opportunities to earn regulated returns on service investments while distinguishing fuel-cost recovery. This establishes a commercial stake in infrastructure and regulation, not a payment-for-action agreement.

    Source notes

    Company-authored primary report for the year ended December 31, 2025, issued in 2026. Reviewed against the locally retained 184-page PDF. No precise publication day assigned. Source-only catalog record; the full publisher PDF is linked. Investment plans are forecasts, not Newport News spending or earned profit.

  • OtherArchived file

    August 4, 2025 development work list: data-center correspondence package

    City of Newport News · Department of DevelopmentDocument date: August 4, 2025

    Mallory Butler’s two-page business-development work list includes a Data Center Correspondence Package with Derek under reports for executive management and the EDA/IDA. This establishes a staff task before the September contribution and easement sequence; it does not disclose the package itself, a project approval or a Dominion funding condition.

    Read full description

    Mallory Butler’s two-page business-development work list includes a Data Center Correspondence Package with Derek under reports for executive management and the EDA/IDA. This establishes a staff task before the September contribution and easement sequence; it does not disclose the package itself, a project approval or a Dominion funding condition.

    Why this record matters

    Original two-page staff work list. Page 2 supplies an earlier correspondence-package lead; the package itself is not attached to this document. Source highlighting is retained.

    The public archive reveals planning before the September funding sequence: An August 4 staff work list names a Data Center Correspondence Package with Derek. On September 5, approved minutes record Kingston reporting Council interest in data centers and tax revenue. These documents show an earlier staff process to investigate; they do not show a campaign contribution caused the planning or a resulting decision.

    Source notes & file details

    Reviewed October 26, 2026. Individual PDF attachment ED Mgr for Business Development_2025_08.04.pdf in 000000003.eml, Mallory Butler to Derek Perry, August 4, 2025, subject Catch-up; City public FOIA release G012027-100925. Both original pages retained unchanged, including source highlighting. The email and other attachments are not reproduced. Publication filename normalized; bytes unchanged.

    File: nn_data_center_worklist_2025-08-04.pdf

  • Meetings & decisionsArchived file

    September 5, 2025 EDA/IDA minutes: Council interest in data centers

    City of Newport News · Economic / Industrial Development AuthoritiesDocument date: September 5, 2025

    Complete approved nine-page minutes, preceded by an ANN source cover. Florence Kingston reports Council interest in data centers and tax revenue; VEDP’s Vince Barnett discusses power, utility partnerships, zoning and fast-track permitting. The minutes also record a separate CNI parking-light utility easement. Attributed discussion is not an adopted City data-center policy or evidence of a contribution-for-action agreement.

    Read full description

    Complete approved nine-page minutes, preceded by an ANN source cover. Florence Kingston reports Council interest in data centers and tax revenue; VEDP’s Vince Barnett discusses power, utility partnerships, zoning and fast-track permitting. The minutes also record a separate CNI parking-light utility easement. Attributed discussion is not an adopted City data-center policy or evidence of a contribution-for-action agreement.

    Why this record matters

    Complete nine-page approved minutes, with an ANN source cover. Public pages 4–5 are printed pages 3–4. The CNI lighting easement described separately in these minutes is not the Dozier site or the York County grant.

    Source notes & file details

    Reviewed October 26, 2026. G012154-101725, 000000008_R.pdf, uploaded October 20, 2025: physical pages 35–43 extracted unchanged from the 52-page redacted packet. Meeting September 5; approved October 3. ANN cover is public PDF page 1; data-center discussion appears on public pages 4–5 (printed 3–4). The other packet sections are not reproduced. Duplicate minutes in another release are the same document, not independent corroboration.

    File: nn_eda_ida_minutes_2025-09-05_public_extract.pdf

  • Meetings & decisionsArchived file

    VEDP’s September 5, 2025 Newport News data-center presentation

    Virginia state agencies · Virginia Economic Development PartnershipDocument date: September 5, 2025

    Seventeen-slide presentation to the Newport News EDA and IDA, Data Centers — An Expanding Opportunity for Virginia. Page 15 recommends utility partnerships, faster permitting, senior local-government permit advocates and tax competitiveness. These are VEDP recommendations, not proof Newport News adopted them or Dominion requested them. Statewide economic and pipeline figures remain the presenter’s claims.

    Read full description

    Seventeen-slide presentation to the Newport News EDA and IDA, Data Centers — An Expanding Opportunity for Virginia. Page 15 recommends utility partnerships, faster permitting, senior local-government permit advocates and tax competitiveness. These are VEDP recommendations, not proof Newport News adopted them or Dominion requested them. Statewide economic and pipeline figures remain the presenter’s claims.

    Why this record matters

    Unchanged 17-page VEDP deck from a City public release. Physical pages 13 and 15 contain the site-selection and permit recommendations. Its statewide project-size examples are not a project specification for the separate 19.35-acre Dozier energy RFI.

    The actual presentation recommends utility partnerships and senior permit advocates: VEDP’s September 5 slides recommend confirming power through utility partnerships, faster permitting and permit advocates at the highest local-government level. The recommendation identifies a specific implementation question: did Newport News change a process for an identified project, when and at whose request? The slides alone do not establish adopted policy or a Dominion instruction.

    Source notes & file details

    Reviewed October 26, 2026. Individual GovQA G012027-100925 attachment Data_Centers_Presentation_NewportNews_DataCenter_9-4-25.pdf, all 17 pages unchanged. Cover dates the presentation September 5 despite the filename. Physical page 12 retains CONFIDENTIAL DRAFT - NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION; this is a City publicly released copy and the label is preserved. Pages 13 and 15 contain site-selection and permitting recommendations. Presenter and occasion also appear in approved meeting minutes.

    File: Data_Centers_Presentation_NewportNews_DataCenter_9-4-25.pdf

  • OtherArchived file

    October 14, 2025 email: Dozier Road energy-site draft circulated for edits

    City of Newport News · Department of DevelopmentDocument date: October 14, 2025

    One-page public extract of Brittany Thompson’s message to City development staff, asking for suggested edits to the attached HR Alliance Dozier Road RFI. The companion draft identifies potential energy-production and storage land. The message establishes internal circulation for review, not final submittal, project approval or a Dominion campaign-related condition.

    Read full description

    One-page public extract of Brittany Thompson’s message to City development staff, asking for suggested edits to the attached HR Alliance Dozier Road RFI. The companion draft identifies potential energy-production and storage land. The message establishes internal circulation for review, not final submittal, project approval or a Dominion campaign-related condition.

    Why this record matters

    Public extract reproduces only the October 14 initial message and identifies omitted signatures and forwarded material. It dates circulation of the companion draft; the two records are not independent corroboration.

    Dozier draft identifies land and unresolved electrical capacity: The October 14 transmittal circulates an energy-production/storage draft for suggested edits. It identifies 19.35 acres at 270, 280 and 294 Dozier Road and describes possible utility extensions or a substation, subject to Dominion confirmation and load assessment. A final submission, capacity commitment, agreement or approval remains unverified. These properties are separate from the York County easement; the email and attachment share an origin.

    Source notes & file details

    Reviewed October 26, 2026. G012154-101725 mailbox bundle kingstonfg_nnva.gov_-_Dominion_and_Dozier.zip, 000000003.eml, October 14, 2025, 19:06:29 +0000. ANN transcription of initial message, official participant names, subject and attached filename. Contact signature and forwarded October 13/October 6 thread omitted; omissions and original retention disclosed in the PDF. Companion attachment is a separate record. Email and attachment share an origin.

    File: nn_dozier_draft_transmittal_2025-10-14_public_extract.pdf

  • OtherArchived file

    Dozier Road energy-production and storage site: October 14, 2025 draft

    City of Newport News · Department of DevelopmentDocument date: October 14, 2025

    Released draft RFI response identifies 270, 280 and 294 Dozier Road, 19.35 acres, as EDA-controlled land. It describes nearby Dominion lines, possible extensions or a substation, with capacity and service options requiring utility confirmation and a load assessment. This is an energy-production/storage draft, not a final commercial data-center contract, electrical-service commitment or executed easement.

    Read full description

    Released draft RFI response identifies 270, 280 and 294 Dozier Road, 19.35 acres, as EDA-controlled land. It describes nearby Dominion lines, possible extensions or a substation, with capacity and service options requiring utility confirmation and a load assessment. This is an energy-production/storage draft, not a final commercial data-center contract, electrical-service commitment or executed easement.

    Why this record matters

    Clearly labeled draft: ANN cover plus faithful rendering of the unchanged DOCX. October 14 dates internal circulation, not approval. Nearby Dominion facilities and typical substation acreage are not confirmed capacity or an executed land grant.

    Source notes & file details

    Reviewed October 26, 2026. G012154-101725, Kingston mailbox bundle, attachment HR Alliance Dozier Road RFI.docx in October 14 email 000000003.eml. ANN source cover plus a faithful four-page PDF rendering of the unchanged released DOCX. Site and acreage: public PDF page 2; electricity discussion: page 4. Date is documented circulation, not an approval or execution date. Original DOCX hash and publication-copy hash retained separately. Distinct from the York County Waterworks easement.

    File: nn_dozier_energy_site_draft_2025-10-14.pdf

  • OtherArchived file

    City–Dominion data-center emails: August 13–20, 2025

    City of Newport News · Development / Dominion Energy correspondenceDocument date: August 20, 2025

    Selected substantive messages from City staff’s correspondence with Dominion’s data-center team. Butler reports being tasked with a rapid SWOT analysis. Dominion advises requesting a no-cost feasibility study for 165 Yorktown Road and 100 Dozier Road, usually taking four to six weeks. This documents an inquiry and advice, not a completed study, committed capacity, special campaign-related terms or a project approval.

    Read full description

    Selected substantive messages from City staff’s correspondence with Dominion’s data-center team. Butler reports being tasked with a rapid SWOT analysis. Dominion advises requesting a no-cost feasibility study for 165 Yorktown Road and 100 Dozier Road, usually taking four to six weeks. This documents an inquiry and advice, not a completed study, committed capacity, special campaign-related terms or a project approval.

    Why this record matters

    Direct City–Dominion correspondence. Page 2 identifies a City SWOT task; page 5 recommends a no-cost study and names 165 Yorktown Road and 100 Dozier Road. Page 6 records an intention to request studies, not an actual submission. No completed study or campaign condition appears in the published messages.

    New emails document Dominion contact and a briefing requested by Jones: City staff sought Dominion’s data-center advice in August; its team recommended a no-cost feasibility study. On September 22, Archer sent Jones briefing material at the mayor’s request, and Jones acknowledged it that evening. These records establish business contact and a requested briefing. They do not connect campaign payments to the separate York County easement or establish a project award.

    Source notes & file details

    G012027-100925, 000000077.eml, attachment control 42. Public extract: ANN source cover and five substantive messages dated August 13, 13, 14, 18 and 20. Scheduling-only messages, signatures, contact strings, link lists and boilerplate omitted; treatment disclosed. PDF page 2: City SWOT task; page 5: utility advice; page 6: acknowledgement. Outer email date August 20. Full original retained. Address 100 Dozier is not presumed the 270/280/294 site. Reviewed October 26, 2026.

    File: nn_dominion_data_center_correspondence_2025-08-13_20_public_extract.pdf

  • OtherArchived file

    September 22, 2025: Jones requests and acknowledges data-center materials

    City of Newport News · City Manager's Office / Office of the MayorDocument date: September 22, 2025

    Mayor Jones’s reply quotes Archer’s message supplying data-center documents at the mayor’s request. Archer names a City white paper, JLARC and VEDP materials, and Carleton/Dozier maps. Tiffany Conatser is copied on the parent. Jones replies that he will review the materials that week. Both messages fall on September 22 in Newport News. This establishes a requested briefing and acknowledgement, not full reading, a project decision or a campaign bargain.

    Read full description

    Mayor Jones’s reply quotes Archer’s message supplying data-center documents at the mayor’s request. Archer names a City white paper, JLARC and VEDP materials, and Carleton/Dozier maps. Tiffany Conatser is copied on the parent. Jones replies that he will review the materials that week. Both messages fall on September 22 in Newport News. This establishes a requested briefing and acknowledgement, not full reading, a project decision or a campaign bargain.

    Why this record matters

    The requested briefing and Jones’s acknowledgement are established by this correspondence family. PDF page 2 places both on September 22 locally; the UTC reply header is September 23. Conatser is copied on Archer’s message, with no authorship or approval inferred. An acknowledgement is not proof every attachment was read.

    The mayor’s briefing is documented; Tiffany Conatser’s role here is copied recipient: Archer’s parent email copies Conatser alongside Joy-Hogg, Kingston and Hollingsworth. Jones’s reply says he will review the material that week. The emails support a requested briefing and acknowledgement; they do not show Conatser authored the paper, negotiated with Dominion or approved a development.

    Source notes & file details

    G012027-100925, reply 000000144.eml (control 63), with quoted parent; original parent 000000094.eml (control 52) also retained. ANN cover plus public transcription on PDF page 2. Parent 22:21:54 UTC September 22 = 6:21:54 p.m. EDT; reply 00:15:01 UTC September 23 = 8:15:01 p.m. EDT September 22. Signatures and contact details omitted. Same correspondence family, not independent corroboration. Conatser’s copied status does not establish authorship or approval. Reviewed October 26, 2026.

    File: nn_mayor_data_center_request_reply_2025-09-22_public_extract.pdf

  • OtherArchived file

    City data-center white paper circulated to Jones September 22, 2025

    City of Newport News · City Manager's Office / DevelopmentDocument date: September 22, 2025

    Complete nine-page City white paper, preceded by an ANN source cover, from the combined attachment Archer sent to Jones. It proposes consultant-supported technology planning, competitive sites, infrastructure assessment, predictable governance, public engagement and marketing. Its preliminary schedule targets planning and adoption. The brief is historical staff analysis, not adopted policy, a completed feasibility study or an executed development agreement.

    Read full description

    Complete nine-page City white paper, preceded by an ANN source cover, from the combined attachment Archer sent to Jones. It proposes consultant-supported technology planning, competitive sites, infrastructure assessment, predictable governance, public engagement and marketing. Its preliminary schedule targets planning and adoption. The brief is historical staff analysis, not adopted policy, a completed feasibility study or an executed development agreement.

    Why this record matters

    ANN cover plus the complete nine-page City white paper. Public page 2 supplies the attraction rationale, page 5 recommendations, and page 6 a tentative timeline. Historical staff analysis and proposals are not treated as current law, adopted policy or project approval. Shared origin with the requested briefing.

    Source notes & file details

    G012027-100925, 000000094.eml (control 52), attachment Data Centers Combined Doc.pdf, original physical pages 1–9 of 117. All nine white-paper pages retained unchanged after ANN cover; public pages 2–10. Key locators: page 2, rationale; page 5, recommendations; page 6, tentative timeline. Date is documented circulation. Full original retained. Legal and other-locality claims are attributed historical analysis, not independently verified or current law. Not established as identical to the August 4 package. Reviewed October 26, 2026.

    File: nn_data_center_brief_2025-09-22_public_extract.pdf

  • OtherArchived file

    Dozier Road development flyer circulated September 22, 2025

    City of Newport News · Economic Development Authority / NN EDGEDocument date: September 22, 2025

    EDA’s two-page marketing flyer identifies 19.35 acres at 270, 280 and 294 Dozier Road, potential industrial uses including energy and data processing/storage, and an RFP timeline still to be determined. It is evidence of a marketing document, not a selected developer, issued RFP, utility commitment or approved construction.

    Read full description

    EDA’s two-page marketing flyer identifies 19.35 acres at 270, 280 and 294 Dozier Road, potential industrial uses including energy and data processing/storage, and an RFP timeline still to be determined. It is evidence of a marketing document, not a selected developer, issued RFP, utility commitment or approved construction.

    Why this record matters

    Original two-page marketing flyer: page 1 identifies 19.35 acres at 270/280/294 Dozier and an RFP timeline to be determined. The different 100 Dozier inquiry address is not silently substituted. Inclusion in a packet does not establish a developer award or utility service.

    Source notes & file details

    G012027-100925, individual attachment DV-26-NN EDGE REAL ESTATE FLYER_Dozier_FINAL.pdf in 000000062.eml (control 35), September 22. Both original pages unchanged; publication filename normalized. The same flyer appears at physical pages 116–117 of the combined document sent to Jones; duplicate copies are not independent corroboration. Date identifies circulation, not authorship. Public office contact retained. Reviewed October 26, 2026.

    File: nn_dozier_marketing_flyer_circulated_2025-09-22.pdf

  • OtherArchived file

    August 8, 2025 draft EDGE property list: possible Dozier data-center use

    City of Newport News · Department of Development / NN EDGEDocument date: August 8, 2025

    One-page staff draft lists sites to present to developers. The Dozier row names industrial/data-center uses, an RFP method and a timeline to be determined, with consideration after site assemblage and control. These are draft recommendations; other rows and addresses are reproduced as released and have not been independently validated.

    Read full description

    One-page staff draft lists sites to present to developers. The Dozier row names industrial/data-center uses, an RFP method and a timeline to be determined, with consideration after site assemblage and control. These are draft recommendations; other rows and addresses are reproduced as released and have not been independently validated.

    Why this record matters

    Unchanged draft property list. The Dozier row proposes possible industrial/data-center use and qualifies RFP timing by assemblage/control. No procurement or final site decision is established. Other draft addresses remain unverified source claims.

    Draft marketing evolves; the current City statement has a different scope: The August 8 list names Dozier data-center possibilities, while its transmittal asks about excluding Dozier from EDGE promotion. The September flyer and October draft notes show later prepared marketing material. The current City page disclaims a developer deal in its planning process. These records require a dated project crosswalk; they do not establish an approved or concealed deal.

    Source notes & file details

    G012027-100925, List_2025_08.08_Draft #4.pdf attached to 000000138.eml (control 61), August 8, 2025. Original single landscape page unchanged; filename normalized. Companion email asks for confirmation about excluding Dozier from EDGE promotion; the list alone does not establish the decision. RFP timing is tentative, not proof of a solicitation or award. Reviewed October 26, 2026.

    File: nn_edge_properties_draft_2025-08-08.pdf

  • OtherArchived file

    August 8, 2025 email asks about excluding Dozier from EDGE promotion

    City of Newport News · Department of Development / NN EDGEDocument date: August 8, 2025

    Butler asks Kingston and Perry for feedback on desired development, timelines and site notes, and confirmation that the properties except Dozier should be promoted with the EDGE Summit. It documents a question at that stage, not an adopted or lasting exclusion. The attached draft list is a separate record.

    Why this record matters

    Complete initial August 8 message with stated omissions. Asking for confirmation of Dozier’s exclusion is not proof a final decision was made or persisted; compare later prepared material rather than infer a concealed change.

    Source notes & file details

    G012027-100925, 000000138.eml, control 61. One-page ANN public extract of the complete initial August 8 message, with official participant names and subject. Signature and forwarded June correspondence omitted; treatment disclosed. Original message and attachment retained. Date converted from 20:53:23 UTC to 4:53:23 p.m. EDT. The question does not establish the answer or a subsequent decision. Reviewed October 26, 2026.

    File: nn_edge_dozier_promotion_email_2025-08-08_public_extract.pdf

  • OtherArchived file

    October 2, 2025 EDGE talking-points draft: Carleton and Dozier

    City of Newport News · Department of Development / NN EDGEDocument date: October 2, 2025

    Selected contiguous section of Derek Perry’s draft speaking notes describes Carleton and Dozier as potential data-center candidates, while also outlining other industrial and energy uses. The email requested edits. This establishes prepared marketing language, not that every statement was delivered or a project was approved.

    Read full description

    Selected contiguous section of Derek Perry’s draft speaking notes describes Carleton and Dozier as potential data-center candidates, while also outlining other industrial and energy uses. The email requested edits. This establishes prepared marketing language, not that every statement was delivered or a project was approved.

    Why this record matters

    Public page 2 is a contiguous verbatim extract of draft speaking notes. It establishes prepared marketing language for the October 2 event, not delivery of a final speech or an approved development. Circulated October 1 locally despite the UTC October 2 email date.

    Source notes & file details

    G012027-100925, DEP's Talking Points_Properties Highlights.docx attached to 000000054.eml, control 30; another attachment control has the same email filename. Sent October 2 at 03:29:59 UTC, October 1 at 11:29:59 p.m. EDT; DOCX names October 2 Summit. ANN source cover plus verbatim Lee Hall overview, Carleton and Dozier sections on public page 2. Other sections and private filesystem path omitted. Original retained. Draft, not a speech transcript; zoning statements remain attributed staff claims. Reviewed October 26, 2026.

    File: nn_edge_lee_hall_talking_points_2025-10-02_public_extract.pdf

  • Meetings & decisionsSource link

    City Digital Infrastructure Readiness Plan: published scope

    City of Newport News · City of Newport NewsDocument date: Date not specified

    City explanation of a separate infrastructure planning process and its stated limits.

    Why this record matters

    Current City planning statement, checked October 26: it disclaims a developer deal and calls hyperscale facilities infeasible. Read within its scope and date; historical inquiries alone do not falsify it.

    Source notes

    Reviewed October 25, 2026. Page describes strategic planning, no developer deal or commitment in that process, and hyperscale facilities as infeasible. Its scope must be distinguished from the described internal AI server room; no contradiction or connection is inferred without a project crosswalk.

  • Contracts & purchasingArchived file

    City contracts register: SIR strategic-support spending (G019711-101626; public extract)

    City of Newport News · City Manager's Office / Finance / Office of PurchasingDocument date: October 21, 2026

    Selected fields from two released contract rows. Contract 26-3357-00 lists $230,574.42 in cumulative Expended Total and $73,425.00 in open purchase orders; 26-3642-01 lists zero expended. The register does not allocate the amounts to data-center advice or identify a Dominion payment.

    Why this record matters

    Exact released contract-level register fields. The spending is not allocated to data-center work; open purchase orders and ceiling fields are not treated as payments.

    City register identifies SIR spending; data-center work-order allocation remains missing: The released register reports $230,574.42 in cumulative spending under SIR contract 26-3357-00, a broad strategic-support agreement, and zero under 26-3642-01. December 2025 EDA minutes document SIR’s presentation and staff engagement. The sources do not allocate the spending to that work or connect it to Dominion.

    Source notes & file details

    G019711-101626, full release closed October 21, 2026. Original City_of_Newport_News_Contracts.xlsx, MUNIS Contracts, rows 19132 and 19205. ANN two-page selected-field transcription; page 2 supplies values and cell locators. Currency formatted and Excel dates converted with field labels retained. Source SHA-256 3f41cada4c6ba05b45f00da9212713d52db15e3dfb749546b7a864a646a97041 matches the retained original. Unexplained ceiling fields are not award values; purchase orders are not spending. Reviewed October 27, 2026.

    File: nn_sir_contract_register_2026-10-21_public_extract.pdf

  • Meetings & decisionsSource link

    December 12, 2025 EDA/IDA minutes: SIR digital-infrastructure presentation

    City of Newport News · Economic / Industrial Development AuthoritiesDocument date: December 12, 2025

    Approved minutes record SIR president John Martin presenting digital-infrastructure planning. Kingston says staff engaged the consultant and acknowledges the need to inform the public. This documents a presentation and staff account, not a project approval, utility study result or campaign agreement.

    Why this record matters

    Approved later planning record documents SIR engagement and presentation. It does not identify the paying work order or validate all economic claims.

    Source notes

    Official 14-page publisher PDF, all pages visually reviewed October 27, 2026. Relevant discussion on printed/physical pages 2-4. Approved January 9, 2026, as shown on final page. Source-only individual minutes; no local publication copy claimed. Presentation claims are attributed, not independently validated economic forecasts. The minutes do not identify the contract or work order used to pay for this advice.

  • Meetings & decisionsSource link

    Carleton rezoning staff report and April 1, 2026 planning discussion

    City of Newport News · Planning / Economic Development AuthorityDocument date: April 28, 2026

    Standalone April 28 agenda item for 165 and 185 Yorktown Road. The included April 1 minutes record planning staff saying data centers were not then allowed under the zoning ordinance. The packet identifies the Carleton parcels and an advanced-manufacturing objective.

    Why this record matters

    Historical staff explanation limits any inference that industrial rezoning itself authorized a data center. Parcel IDs help identify Carleton; Dozier remains separate.

    The later Carleton decision is industrial rezoning, with a documented data-center limit: Planning staff told the April 1 commission that data centers were not then allowed. The April 28 ordinance rezones Carleton for light industry with proffers. That is an identifiable later action concerning the earlier inquiry site, but it is not a reviewed data-center operator approval.

    Source notes

    Official individual 33-page agenda item 26-052, CZ-2026-0001. Targeted review October 27: physical pages 1-7, 12-15 and 20-24. Data-center exchange spans physical pages 21-22; parcel IDs appear on page 12. This historical staff explanation is not a comprehensive current legal opinion. The agenda draft is distinguished from the separately published adopted Ordinance 8156-26.

  • Meetings & decisionsSource link

    Adopted Ordinance 8156-26: Carleton light-industrial rezoning

    City of Newport News · City Council / PlanningDocument date: April 28, 2026

    City-certified ordinance records April 28, 2026 adoption of the zoning-map change for 165 and 185 Yorktown Road with proffers. It establishes an adopted industrial rezoning, not approval of a data-center operator or a Dominion service agreement.

    Why this record matters

    Final adoption is established by the certified ordinance. No individual vote or operator approval is inferred.

    Source notes

    Official eight-page publisher PDF linked from the City Actions and Resolutions index. Physical pages 1-2 visually reviewed October 27, 2026 for operative text and certified adoption date; the proffer attachments were not separately re-reviewed in this final edition. Source-only record. It is not the 33-page agenda packet, and no roll-call attribution is inferred from the mayor signature.

  • Budget & financeSource link

    DHCD June 26, 2026 announcement: SCALE energy-cluster grant

    Virginia state agencies · Virginia Department of Housing and Community Development / GO VirginiaDocument date: June 26, 2026

    State announcement lists $154,391 for SCALE, a Regions 4 and 5 energy-sector initiative involving regional economic-development organizations. This is a public program grant, distinct from campaign contributions and the separate SEFC founding grant history.

    Why this record matters

    Announced state grant for a separate regional energy program; not a campaign donation or final spending total.

    Source notes

    Primary state announcement; ENERGY TECHNOLOGY & CLEAN ENERGY SUPPLY CHAINS / SCALE section. Reviewed October 27, 2026. It confirms announced grant approval, not disbursement, final expenditure or any payment to Jones. The broader $5.6 million announcement covers other projects and is not assigned to Newport News.

  • OtherSource link

    SCALE announcement: Dominion describes its Energy Growth Council interest

    Other public body · Dominion Energy Innovation Center / SCALE partnersDocument date: August 14, 2026

    DEIC announces the grant and names Dominion, Hampton Roads Alliance and the Secure Energy Future Center among partners. Dominion vice president Nate Frost describes participation as a way to communicate purchasing needs and identify technologies. It documents a declared commercial purpose, not a campaign condition.

    Why this record matters

    Dominion’s declared supplier and technology purpose is attributed. No corrupt agreement or connection to SIR fees is established.

    Dominion publicly explains one regional program interest: In the SCALE announcement, Dominion’s Nate Frost describes access to suppliers, communicating the utility’s needs and identifying technology. DHCD separately confirms the $154,391 grant announcement. DEIC describes itself as an independent nonprofit. This documents business participation, not proof that political donations purchased influence.

    Source notes

    Primary program announcement dated August 14, 2026; Frost statement, proposed workstreams and partner list reviewed October 27. DEIC is an independent nonprofit partnership, not treated as the regulated utility or its campaign PAC. This regional market study is not the requested 2025 parcel-power feasibility study. Announced funding is not proof of grant cash received.

  • OtherSource link

    Dominion Energy Innovation Center: organizational description

    Other public body · Dominion Energy Innovation CenterDocument date: Date not specified

    DEIC describes itself as an independent nonprofit public-private partnership founded by Dominion Energy, Ashland, Hanover County and Activation Capital. This supplies the organizational distinction required when reading SCALE announcements.

    Why this record matters

    DEIC is described as independent; do not merge the nonprofit, utility and PAC.

    Source notes

    Current institutional About page reviewed October 27, 2026. Self-description, not a review of incorporation, tax filings or all governance arrangements. No exact publication date inferred. Founding/sponsorship does not make DEIC identical to Dominion Energy Virginia or Dominion Energy PAC.

  • Contracts & purchasingSource link

    City contract list dated October 18, 2026: ePlus 20-3019-00

    City of Newport News · Office of PurchasingDocument date: October 18, 2026

    City purchasing list identifying ePlus as a cooperative technology reseller, vendor 16681.

    Why this record matters

    Same October 18 contract-list edition already used by the AI file. Page 16 identifies two SIR contracts; it supplies no work-order price or scope.

    Source notes

    Retrieved list internally dated October 18, 2026; PDF page 3 of 18. Lists 20-3019-00, Technology Value-Added Resellers, vendor 16681, COOP, estimated start February 20, 2020, current term end January 1, 2028, estimated end December 31, 2029, administrator Simone Williams. This is the currently retrieved edition of mutable DocumentCenter ID 18339, distinct from the older September-labeled catalog entry. No AI order or amount is listed. Additional targeted review October 27, 2026: PDF page 16 also lists SIR contracts 26-3357-00 and 26-3642-01. This is the same maintained DocumentCenter edition, reused for a second subject without creating a duplicate source record.

  • Court & legal recordsSource link

    SCC’s November 25, 2025 Dominion base-rate final order

    Virginia state agencies · Virginia State Corporation CommissionDocument date: November 25, 2025

    The final order sets 2026–2027 rates in PUR-2025-00058. It approves $565.7 million in added annual revenue for 2026 and another $209.9 million for 2027, below the requests. Its 1,000-kWh residential illustration is an $11.24 monthly increase in 2026 and an additional $2.36 in 2027. It also orders further work on large-load cost allocation. These are proceeding-specific illustrations, not a calculation of a particular household’s total bill.

    Read full description

    The final order sets 2026–2027 rates in PUR-2025-00058. It approves $565.7 million in added annual revenue for 2026 and another $209.9 million for 2027, below the requests. Its 1,000-kWh residential illustration is an $11.24 monthly increase in 2026 and an additional $2.36 in 2027. It also orders further work on large-load cost allocation. These are proceeding-specific illustrations, not a calculation of a particular household’s total bill.

    Why this record matters

    Final rate order, distinct from an application. The standardized bill illustration and approved return are not a household-specific audit or a campaign-payment finding.

    The household-cost branch now has a final base-rate benchmark: The November 2025 final order illustrates $11.24 more monthly for a 1,000-kWh household in 2026 and an additional $2.36 in 2027, below Dominion’s request. This is separate from the later transmission rider, energy use, other adjustments and municipal VEPGA rates. A personal bill increase cannot be attributed to a political payment from this example.

    Source notes

    Source-only 30-page final order. Cover and selected sections on printed/PDF pages 2–8 and 15–18 reviewed in publisher text, not a complete read of all attachments. Page 4 states the illustrative bill changes and effective dates; pages 16–17 direct additional allocation work. The approved 9.8% ROE is below the requested 10.4%. Do not add every request or later rider figure without reconciling dates and overlapping components. No payment-to-official condition is identified.

  • Court & legal recordsSource link

    SCC’s July 31, 2026 Rider T1 order: cost allocation and direct connection costs

    Virginia state agencies · Virginia State Corporation CommissionDocument date: July 31, 2026

    In PUR-2026-00056, the SCC approves amended transmission allocation and records the projected 1,000-kWh residential increase falling from $2.90 to $0.94 per month. Page 10 describes Dominion’s preference to let existing protections mature before further direct-assignment changes, with alternatives if the SCC proceeded. Pages 11–12 instead require a proposed mandatory contribution policy for defined direct-connect facilities, using a net-of-revenue approach. This documents a specific company position and regulatory response, without identifying a campaign bargain.

    Read full description

    In PUR-2026-00056, the SCC approves amended transmission allocation and records the projected 1,000-kWh residential increase falling from $2.90 to $0.94 per month. Page 10 describes Dominion’s preference to let existing protections mature before further direct-assignment changes, with alternatives if the SCC proceeded. Pages 11–12 instead require a proposed mandatory contribution policy for defined direct-connect facilities, using a net-of-revenue approach. This documents a specific company position and regulatory response, without identifying a campaign bargain.

    Why this record matters

    Dominion supported the adopted allocation methodology while opposing immediate additional direct assignment. Those positions concern different reforms. Preserve its alternatives and the prospective, net-of-revenue limits of the ordered policy.

    The transmission order documents the requested outcome and regulatory response: Dominion argued for allowing existing protections to mature before further direct-assignment changes, while offering alternatives. The SCC ordered a proposed mandatory, net-of-revenue contribution policy for defined direct-connect facilities. It separately adopted an allocation method supported by Dominion that lowered the projected 1,000-kWh residential Rider T1 increase from $2.90 to $0.94 monthly. These are different reforms; no campaign condition is established.

    Source notes

    Source-only 17-page final order, DCC 260750228. Publisher text reviewed across the document; printed/PDF pages 7 and 10 visually checked. Pages 6–7 show Dominion also supported the amended 12-CP allocation adopted by the SCC. Pages 10–14 describe the separate direct-assignment dispute, alternatives, revenue credit and scope limits. The 67.5% reduction concerns the projected Rider T1 increase, not the whole bill. Future contributions are net of a transmission-revenue credit; this does not require payment of every gross grid cost. Policy filing was directed within 90 days. No violation for a deadline not yet reached is alleged.

  • Court & legal recordsSource link

    SCC’s August 25, 2026 order opening the large-load transmission-cost docket

    Virginia state agencies · Virginia State Corporation CommissionDocument date: August 25, 2026

    Order establishes PUR-2026-00131 to receive the filings directed by the July 31 Rider T1 decision. It preserves the 90-day policy-proposal and 120-day coordination-update periods measured from that earlier order. It establishes the forum, not an approved amended policy or a finding of noncompliance.

    Why this record matters

    Confirms the new forum and the deadlines measured from July 31. It is not the final amended policy or a ruling on compliance.

    Source notes

    Complete two-page publisher text reviewed October 28, 2026. DCC 260850026. Page 2 identifies the required filings and the docket receiving subsequent submissions. This procedural order does not set a new 90-day period from August 25. No missed deadline is alleged. The amended policy itself and any deadline-extension ruling remain unrecovered in this pass. Source-only PDF.

  • Court & legal recordsSource link

    Dominion’s October 22, 2026 response on cooperative participation in cost-rule coordination

    Other public body · Dominion Energy Virginia / SCC case PUR-2026-00056Document date: October 22, 2026

    Dominion asks the SCC to deny ODEC’s request for formal coordinating-party status as unnecessary, saying coordination is already taking place. It reports an October 19 meeting with ODEC and other electric distribution organizations and anticipates federal agreement amendments after the new state proceeding. These are the company’s representations and requested procedural outcome, not a Commission finding that coordination was sufficient.

    Read full description

    Dominion asks the SCC to deny ODEC’s request for formal coordinating-party status as unnecessary, saying coordination is already taking place. It reports an October 19 meeting with ODEC and other electric distribution organizations and anticipates federal agreement amendments after the new state proceeding. These are the company’s representations and requested procedural outcome, not a Commission finding that coordination was sufficient.

    Why this record matters

    A litigant’s position and reported meeting, not adjudicated facts. The original motion, meeting materials and any resolving order remain missing; no local campaign involvement is identified.

    A newer filing reports coordination, while the policy text remains missing: Dominion’s October 22 response reports an October 19 meeting with ODEC and other distribution organizations. It opposes formal reopening as unnecessary because, it says, coordination is already taking place. The August 25 order identifies PUR-2026-00131 as the proper forum for the required filings. Neither record establishes the approved final policy or an official’s campaign-related intervention.

    Source notes

    Eight-page publisher PDF, including eFiling cover and transmittal; complete available text reviewed October 28. The cover’s seven-page count excludes the eFiling sheet. DCC 261060074, filed October 22 at 11:18:57 a.m. PDF pages 4–5 / pleading pages 2–3 contain paragraphs 4–8, the reported meeting and request. ODEC is a separate cooperative, not Dominion Energy. The underlying October 1 motion and a ruling resolving it were not retrieved. No exclusion from all discussions, completed policy, local official’s involvement or campaign condition is established. Source-only PDF.

  • Policies & proceduresSource link

    Dominion’s full lobbying and political-contributions policy

    Other public body · Dominion Energy / Corporate governanceDocument date: Date not specified

    Four-page company policy expressly states that its Virginia, South Carolina and Utah state PACs use corporate contributions. It describes corporate-purpose criteria, senior-management approvals, employee time/expense recording, coalition and grassroots activity, and annual reporting to the Board Audit Committee. These are the company’s stated rules and governance, not proof of compliance, utility-rate treatment or an individual official’s conduct.

    Read full description

    Four-page company policy expressly states that its Virginia, South Carolina and Utah state PACs use corporate contributions. It describes corporate-purpose criteria, senior-management approvals, employee time/expense recording, coalition and grassroots activity, and annual reporting to the Board Audit Committee. These are the company’s stated rules and governance, not proof of compliance, utility-rate treatment or an individual official’s conduct.

    Why this record matters

    Company policy expressly identifies corporate contributions through its Virginia state PAC and describes approval, time-recording and Audit Committee oversight. Stated governance is not transaction-specific compliance or cost-recovery evidence.

    Source notes

    Individual four-page policy linked from the company’s political-disclosure webpage. All four pages text-reviewed October 30, 2026; the corporate-contribution paragraph on PDF p. 1 visually checked. Exact publication day unverified. Distinguish corporate-funded state PACs from the separately described voluntary federal PAC. The policy does not by itself identify which customer or shareholder bore a particular payment. Source-only record.

  • Budget & financeSource link

    Dominion Rider T1: filed transmission rates effective September 1, 2026

    Other public body · Virginia Electric and Power Company / Filed tariffsDocument date: August 11, 2026

    Filed tariff lists a 1.2730-cent/kWh energy charge for Schedule 1 and the other named residential schedules, effective for usage on and after September 1, 2026. For a standard Schedule 1 customer using 1,000 kWh, that energy term is $12.73. This is the transmission component, not the whole bill, a $12.73 increase or an identified campaign/lobbying charge. Special net-metering demand provisions and business schedules differ.

    Read full description

    Filed tariff lists a 1.2730-cent/kWh energy charge for Schedule 1 and the other named residential schedules, effective for usage on and after September 1, 2026. For a standard Schedule 1 customer using 1,000 kWh, that energy term is $12.73. This is the transmission component, not the whole bill, a $12.73 increase or an identified campaign/lobbying charge. Special net-metering demand provisions and business schedules differ.

    Why this record matters

    Schedule 1 energy-term example: 1,000 × 1.2730 cents / 100 = $12.73. Total transmission component, not the whole bill or a $12.73 increase. No campaign-cost tracing.

    Transmission tariff amounts and political disclosures have independent accounting trails: The filed Rider T1 rate supplies a $12.73 transmission component for 1,000 kWh on the stated Schedule 1 example. The SCC’s $0.94 projected change uses a different comparison, against the prior approved charge. Lobbying filings and the company’s internal policy identify reported political activity and records to seek. A City bill comparison should use the same meter, usage, tariff and billing period, while any assertion about recovery of a specific expense requires the utility account and approved rate treatment for that expense.

    Filed rates and extension terms narrow the customer-cost questions: Current Rider T1 supports a standard Schedule 1 energy-term example of $12.73 at 1,000 kWh, distinct from a bill increase and from campaign costs. General extension terms identify a four-times-revenue allowance for covered facilities; actual project workpapers and cost allocation are needed to test the burden on other customers. The latest direct-connect submission and refund calculations remain unrecovered.

    Source notes

    Individual one-page Rider T1 linked from the company’s current Virginia business-rates page. Filing date August 11 and usage-effective date September 1, 2026 are printed on the sheet. Table and footnotes visually checked October 30. Calculation: 1,000 kWh × 1.2730 cents / 100 = $12.73 for the stated energy-term example. The July 31 SCC order’s projected $0.94 monthly increase is a different measure. No customer invoice or political-expense tracing is supplied. Source-only record.

  • Policies & proceduresSource link

    Dominion line-extension terms: nonresidential cost and revenue allowance

    Other public body · Virginia Electric and Power Company / Filed tariffsDocument date: December 9, 2025

    Section XXII terms filed December 9, 2025 and effective January 1, 2026. Paragraph D.1 requires payment of specified extension costs above four times continuing estimated annual revenue, excluding fuel revenue, for the described new nonresidential/three-phase service. Actual applicability depends on facilities, customer category, costs and agreements. This general rule is not the unrecovered direct-connect proposal in PUR-2026-00131 or proof of a data-center subsidy.

    Read full description

    Section XXII terms filed December 9, 2025 and effective January 1, 2026. Paragraph D.1 requires payment of specified extension costs above four times continuing estimated annual revenue, excluding fuel revenue, for the described new nonresidential/three-phase service. Actual applicability depends on facilities, customer category, costs and agreements. This general rule is not the unrecovered direct-connect proposal in PUR-2026-00131 or proof of a data-center subsidy.

    Why this record matters

    PDF p. 5, D.1: specified new-service extension costs above four times expected annual revenue excluding fuel. Obtain actual project classification, costs, credit and agreement; do not presume a subsidy or equate this with the later direct-connect proposal.

    Source notes

    Individual 13-page tariff section linked from the company’s terms page. Definitions, nonresidential rules, exceptions and footer dates text-reviewed; PDF p. 5, paragraph D.1 visually checked October 30, 2026. The allowance covers specified cost categories, not every upstream facility. Project estimates, revenue assumptions, signed agreements, invoices and rate-allocation records are needed to quantify who pays. No Dozier project approval, capacity commitment or campaign-related waiver is established. Source-only record.

  • Court & legal recordsSource link

    SCC explanation of large-load customer protections and Rider T1 reforms

    Virginia state agencies · Virginia State Corporation CommissionDocument date: September 3, 2026

    Official explanation of separate large-load rates, contract and minimum-payment safeguards, and the framework for assigning direct-connect transmission costs.

    Source notes

    Source-only SCC webpage. Selected data-center and Rider T1 sections checked October 30. Some provisions begin January 1, 2027; the supplemental direct-connect proceeding remains distinct from an implemented final policy. No complete later-order review is claimed.

Open questions 3

  • Which Newport News projects create additional Dominion demand?

    A project crosswalk identifying the City AI room, City Hall data-center relocation, Jefferson Lab facilities and any commercial proposal; load estimates, service applications, executed development agreements, incentive approvals and utility cost-allocation terms for each.

    Likely custodian: City Information Technology, Development, Planning, Finance and relevant project owners; public-agency records where actually held.

    The City’s readiness page states limits on its planning process and hyperscale feasibility. Regional data-center demand does not establish a Dominion-funded local project, a secret development agreement or a donor-related approval.

    Submit this record
  • Did the feasibility process produce a result or a project decision?

    Actual High-Level Feasibility Study submissions, tracking identifiers, load letters and completed Dominion results following the August 18 advice; any capacity reservation, service commitment, upgrade cost allocation or later executed agreement; records identifying who tasked the rapid SWOT and what Jones specifically requested; earlier versions of the August 4 correspondence package; final consultant scope, plan, adoption and permitting decisions. Reconcile 100 Dozier Road with 270/280/294 Dozier using parcel and project records. Review existing public releases first; no new request has been sent. Follow the two now-identified SIR contracts, 26-3357-00 and 26-3642-01, to executed scopes, work orders, invoices, deliverables and amendments. Identify any final digital-infrastructure plan or later zoning change after the April 1, 2026 staff explanation. For SCALE, distinguish grant agreement, matching-fund commitments, disbursements, council membership and meeting outputs from campaign records. No request, form or message was sent.

    Likely custodian: City Development / EDA / IDA, Manager, Mayor’s Office and Planning; relevant public VEDP/Hampton Roads Alliance files; already-public Dominion filings or correspondence.

    Named City–Dominion contact, a study recommendation and Jones’s requested briefing are now documented. Their existence does not establish a completed study, adopted recommendation, project approval or political exchange. Exact tasking, study results and final decisions would test those remaining propositions. The September briefing is not proven identical to the August package. Later consultant engagement and an adopted industrial rezoning are now documented. They do not show a completed parcel-power study or the amount paid for data-center advice.

    Submit this record
  • Which project costs and revenue allowances reached other customers?

    Recover the actual facility classification, engineering cost estimate, annual-revenue assumptions excluding fuel, paragraph D.1 allowance, signed line-extension/service agreement, customer payment, later true-up and rate-allocation entries for any identified project. Reconcile these with the direct-connect policy required in PUR-2026-00131; recover the proposal, any extension and subsequent ruling. Match a customer’s complete bill and applicable schedule to Rider T1 before stating an individual bill effect.

    Likely custodian: SCC public case files; City agencies for project records actually held; utility or project owner for voluntary disclosures.

    General tariff terms identify variables, not a quantified subsidy or Dozier approval. The $12.73 example is a transmission component, not an increase or political-cost allocation. SCC access failed; no missed October 29 deadline is alleged.

    Submit this record