This page was read by OCR. Text can misread numbers, dates or table columns. Check the PDF before quoting or interpreting it. Redacted areas remain redacted.
Parent/student complaint - administrative chronology
PARENT-PREPARED CHRONOLOGY - UNDERLYING RECORDS REQUIRED
Redacted source excerpt | Original PDF page(s): 5
Family identifiers, private forwarding details and unrelated passages omitted.
11. July 22, 2026 — Superintendent Response
Superintendent Dr. Michele Mitchell responded in writing.
She stated that my appeal was being considered by Dr. Eleanor Blowe, Chief Schools Officer,
and that | would receive a written response from Dr. Blowe explaining the decision.
The Superintendent further stated that if | was dissatisfied with Dr. Blowe's decision, | could
appeal the matter to the Superintendent.
This correspondence is important because it documents the Superintendent's stated process for
handling my appeal.
12. July 23-27, 2026 — Appeal Process Correspondence
Additional correspondence occurred concerning the handling of my appeal.
| continued to raise concerns regarding the appropriate office and individual responsible for
reviewing a Non-Employee Discrimination Complaint and questioned the process being used.
After being instructed to resubmit the appeal, | did so.
13. July 27, 2026 — Resubmission of Appeal to Superintendent
At approximately 4:34 p.m., | resubmitted my written appeal to Superintendent Dr. Michele
Mitchell.
The resubmission included the same substantive concerns regarding the handling of my
Non-Employee Discrimination Complaint and requested a written response.
| retained proof of delivery.
‘Audit Newport News | Reviewed October 26, 2026 | Selected source material
3/6 | Parent statements are allegations; official statements retain their attribution.Jump to an indexed page (6 of 6)