Public Records

Selected ANN transcription of White’s January 22 17:23:19 UTC message; private routing, signature and quoted chain omitted. Read with the earlier response and January 23 correction. Withheld contents and seven/ten-email overlap remain unverified.

File: dsa_foia_omission_correction_2026_01_22_Redacted.pdf

Owner-supplied mailbox record reviewed October 31, 2026. Selected ANN transcription of the identified message; private contact/routing fields, signatures and unrelated quoted material omitted. Original preserved privately. The copy records the sender’s position, not an independent finding.

File: nnps-exclusion-list-transmittal-2026-01-14.pdf

Owner-supplied mailbox record reviewed October 31, 2026. Selected ANN transcription of the identified message; private contact/routing fields, signatures and unrelated quoted material omitted. Original preserved privately. The copy records the sender’s position, not an independent finding.

File: nnps-foia-additional-withholding-2026-01-23.pdf

Owner-supplied mailbox record reviewed October 31, 2026. Selected ANN transcription of the identified message; private contact/routing fields, signatures and unrelated quoted material omitted. Original preserved privately. The copy records the sender’s position, not an independent finding.

File: nnps-foia-log-no-records-2026-07-29.pdf

April 23 at 12:20 p.m., Seely followed a phone call about Discovery safety-audit review and cited § 22.1-279.8(B). Her characterization of the procedure is attributed correspondence, not an independent legal conclusion. The email does not establish forwarding to NNPS, completed review or the timing of the final restriction decision. Original page 1 of 2; logo-only second page omitted.

File: dsa-2025-04-23-audit-review-procedure.pdf

City Request Center acknowledgment and referral to Michelle Price as NNPS FOIA officer, dated September 23, 2024 at 1:26 p.m. The request concerns a claimed morning encounter; the response does not establish that the encounter occurred, that video existed, or that footage was produced. Private requester and contact details permanently removed.

File: dsa-2024-09-23-video-request-referral.pdf

Only the identified source pages are reproduced, with further privacy/security redactions. The original has 27 pages. June 24, 2024 is a crisis-plan review/update field, not a verified survey issue date. This is not the separate 37-page, double-sided Crisis Management Plan described in the April 4 response. Publication copy with permanent redactions; original source retained privately.

File: dsa-2024-safety-survey-overview-excerpt.pdf

The later PDF print header is not evidence that White authored or handled this March correspondence. Publication copy with permanent redactions; original source retained privately.

File: dsa-2025-03-14-administration-records-request.pdf

The letter calls the interval ten working days and states April 14 through April 26, 2025. Those are the document’s words, not a recalculated interval. Conduct allegations remain attributed. Publication copy with permanent redactions; original source retained privately.

File: dsa-2025-04-14-interim-restriction.pdf

Dated April 23, 2025; the official-letter transmittal is April 24. The signed scan and corresponding embedded attachment render identically. Allegations and a charge are not an adjudication; receipt and final court disposition are not established by the letter. Publication copy with permanent redactions; original source retained privately.

File: dsa-2025-04-23-signed-final-restriction.pdf

December 12, 2:29 p.m. Requested categories do not independently prove the records exist. Private requester details are removed. Publication copy with permanent redactions; original source retained privately.

File: dsa-2025-12-12-counsel-foia-request.pdf

December 12, 3:09 p.m. Documents later FOIA administration, not White’s participation in the earlier encounters or ban issuance. Publication copy with permanent redactions; original source retained privately.

File: dsa-2025-12-12-white-referral.pdf

December 15, 11:46 a.m. An inquiry during the search, not a final no-records determination. Publication copy with permanent redactions; original source retained privately.

File: dsa-2025-12-15-spratley-inquiry-1146.pdf

December 15, noon. A promise to send information does not by itself establish that it was delivered or the release was complete. Publication copy with permanent redactions; original source retained privately.

File: dsa-2025-12-15-spratley-response-1200.pdf

December 15, 11:57 a.m. The City-specific statement does not establish that no request was made to NNPS. Publication copy with permanent redactions; original source retained privately.

File: dsa-2025-12-15-spratley-scope-1157.pdf

December 15, 11:59 a.m. Intermediate scope clarification; the City’s request history and NNPS’s request history are distinct. Publication copy with permanent redactions; original source retained privately.

File: dsa-2025-12-15-stewart-scope-1159.pdf

December 15, 12:06–12:07 p.m. Search-scope correspondence, not a complete production inventory or certification. Publication copy with permanent redactions; original source retained privately.

File: dsa-2025-12-15-white-scope-1206.pdf

The December 19 response states a seven-workday extension due to volume; it is not a final production certification. Publication copy with permanent redactions; original source retained privately.

File: dsa-2025-12-19-foia-extension.pdf

The sender’s timing assertions and proposed court action remain attributed statements, not an established violation or filed proceeding. Publication copy with permanent redactions; original source retained privately.

File: dsa-2025-12-19-foia-followup.pdf

Council response dated September 7, 2026 in the rendered email header, responding to the September 1 request. The Council identifies one responsive record and explains its holdings. The released July 21, 2025 email chain is cataloged separately. Publication copy; private contact details removed where present. Original retained separately.

File: foia-council-nnps-historical-officers-public.pdf

Reviewed form held by Audit Newport News. Despite “Final” in the supplied filename, the form states “THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE” and the final-estimate date is blank. Date shown is the cost-estimate date, August 24, 2026; the form lists August 25 as the deposit date. This form alone does not establish the final billed or paid amount. Publication copy; private contact details removed where present. Original retained separately.

File: nnps-opening-day-cost-estimate-2026-public.pdf

Agency and requester correspondence on April 4, 2025; top Spratley reply is dated in the rendered email header. This is a response chain, not the safety audit itself. A separate entry records the April 17 arrangement for review of a redacted audit. Requester assertions remain attributed to the requester. Publication copy; private contact details removed where present. Original retained separately.

File: seely-discovery-safety-audit-2025-public.pdf

Spratley reply dated April 17, 2025 in the rendered email header. The agency discusses excluding vulnerability-assessment components and cites its statutory basis. This reply does not contain the audit or establish that a review occurred. Publication copy; private contact details removed where present. Original retained separately.

File: spratley-discovery-safety-review-public.pdf

Email chain includes White’s January 22, 2026 agency response. Employment contract and job-description documents referenced by the reply are separately cataloged; they are not attached to this email PDF. Requester statements are attributed claims and do not establish misconduct. Publication copy; private contact details removed where present. Original retained separately.

File: white-foia-employment-intake-2026-public.pdf