Dates follow the cited records; document dates are labeled separately.
October 14, 2025
Embedded teacher message displays an IEP coordination reply
An embedded screenshot displays this date and a teacher reply proposing coordination with a supervisor and a teacher for an IEP meeting. Its January forwarding date is separate. This is scheduling content, not authenticated original email headers, a completed meeting or an adopted IEP.
January 12, 2026
Initial disability determination and corrected notice
The initial review found no manifestation of disability and no IEP-implementation failure. The corrected notice uses an administrative self-defense characterization and distinguishes bullying/school-climate review. Those statements do not decide criminal-court self-defense.
January 13, 2026
Updated invitation anticipates psychologist participation
The supplied chain includes an updated request for the January 15 meeting reflecting planned school-psychologist participation. It also includes an individually undated wrong-attachment correction. An invitation does not establish attendance or a completed assessment.
January 15, 2026
Reconvened team reverses the disability relationship finding
The revised notice finds the behavior related to disability and says the school-based suspension will not be served. It continues to find no failure to implement the existing IEP. The changed manifestation decision is not an admission that every service or safety complaint was established. A newly supplied rendition of the manifestation form selects the same two answers and lists committee members. Blank signature lines do not independently verify attendance; this is not a second administrative determination.
January 16, 2026
MDR follow-up and transmittal reveal a meeting-date discrepancy
The parent requests MDR paperwork and Faulk promises documents. A separately supplied January 16 covering email says three documents are attached and refers to January 22. The supplied meeting-request form bears a January 16 document date but displays January 15 as the meeting date. Retain the discrepancy and obtain operative versions, transmission/receipt and meeting records; neither the covering email nor a listed attachment proves attendance.
January 20, 2026
Forwarded email contains a login-error photograph
The supplied forwarding envelope displays January 20 and contains a Clever login-error photograph. Capture date, cause and duration are not independently established; browser/account/session/reference identifiers are withheld. Read it alongside the following day’s restoration confirmation.
January 21, 2026
Parent confirms restored login and reports no homebound teacher yet
Seiders relays a Help Desk access check and a planned IEP meeting. The parent confirms login now works, reports independent work with no homebound teacher yet, and thanks staff for following up. The reported teacher concern is distinct from independently verified assignment or delivered hours.
January 22, 2026
Plan specifies instructional minutes and an assessment commitment
Three home-based service rows beginning January 23 each specify 320 minutes every two weeks: 960 minutes, or 16 hours, in total. A preliminary plan commits the team to meet within 30 days for a comprehensive FBA and corresponding BIP. These are commitments, not delivery or completion logs. A later supplied full table also includes a 960-minute study/organizational-skills row for January 15-22, before the January 23 subject rows. It supplies prior-period context, not delivery or operative-version proof.
January 22, 2026
Vitullo relays a reported assignment-related voicemail
At 2:23 PM, Vitullo says she communicated with the homebound office and Brown reported leaving a voicemail that afternoon. A separate parent message thanks staff for the update. This adds material follow-up to the teacher concern; voicemail receipt, completed assignment and delivered teaching remain unverified.
January 28, 2026
Parent agrees to proposed placement
The placement agreement is checked and dated January 28. The family signature is withheld. Consent is material counterevidence when assessing placement; it does not establish the hours of instruction actually delivered.
January 29, 2026
Teacher assignment email describes home-based services
Octavia Brown’s email names a teacher, describes a January 15-30 home-based assignment period and states that 16 hours will be provided. The prospective assignment and the January 23 service-grid start need reconciliation against dated lesson records; the email does not prove a shortfall.
February 1, 2026
Earlier progress report describes a classroom-measurement limit
The supplied February 1 progress report repeatedly says goals cannot be accurately measured in the classroom while the student is homebound. Selected administrative comments are now available; individual goals and scores remain private. This is not the complete instruction ledger or later September reading-trial data.
February 2, 2026
Same-day handoff confirmation accompanies a missing-assignment report
The parent initially asks about updated hours/information. Faulk says documents were sent after January 28 consent and offers to forward the message. The parent later says the teacher has updated information but still reports no assignments yet and describes a plan to obtain them. This is contemporaneous coordination evidence, not a complete service ledger.
February 6, 2026
NNPS requests dates and describes an IEP draft
Faulk asks for available dates between February 16 and 27 and describes a draft that can be updated at the meeting. A request and draft do not establish a completed meeting, adopted plan or implemented changes.
February 8, 2026
NNPS promises a draft update and scheduling follow-up
Faulk acknowledges information in two emails, says she will update the draft and coordinate with the school team, and hopes to respond by Wednesday. The message records a stated follow-up, not the outcome.
February 10, 2026
Invitation proposes a February 19 IEP meeting
Faulk’s message offers an in-person or remote February 19 meeting and refers to a draft. The scheduled date is prospective; no completed-meeting or adopted-IEP finding follows from this invitation.
February 11, 2026
Attendance coding and assignment access are discussed
Faulk says the student is marked homebound from January to April after contacting relevant staff. The parent raises attendance/workload concerns. The chain includes an undated teacher-message image describing closed or undated assignments and eight hours of weekly assistance. The image has no visible sent date and is not a delivery ledger.
February 11, 2026
NNPS describes a platform update and revised IEP draft
Faulk says an updated draft will follow completion of a Synergy update and that accommodation wording or appearance may differ. The parent acknowledges the reply. The adopted IEP and before/after versions are needed to determine actual substantive changes.
February 11, 2026
Parent requests a further review meeting
The parent asks for a follow-up meeting before a planned board appearance. The later chain includes staff availability and parent requests for sufficient review time. A request does not establish a completed review or a June interview.
February 23, 2026
Meeting correspondence settles on February 26
February 18-23 messages document availability, a limited slot, the request for a longer meeting, and Seiders’s decision to keep February 26. She says concerns were reviewed using information previously shared; the parent acknowledges the meeting. The separately published February 26 reply acknowledges a meeting, while these invitations alone do not prove attendance.
February 27, 2026
Reading restriction appears alongside documented teacher assistance
The contact log records help with an assignment and a later message that Quest tutoring could not be attended because of the homebound restriction after consultation with Holmes. The same page therefore contains both assistance and an access restriction. Equivalent reading services still need verification.
March 12, 2026
NNPS describes legal consultation and an interim school option
Seiders says she is consulting division counsel and asks about the parent’s account that an SRO filed a petition. She says an interim option remains available; the parent acknowledges the offer and describes the family preference. The exchange neither resolves who filed what nor establishes a completed June investigation.
March 26, 2026
Parent reports return to school and improvement
Responding to Seiders’s check-in, the parent reports the student is back in school, doing well and happier after several days. This is affirmative attributed return/progress evidence, not an independently verified exact attendance date or proof that every earlier instructional hour was made up.
April 1, 2026
March packet is submitted with 24 reported instructional hours
The timesheet covers March 1-23 and is submitted April 1. Nine March 2-20 rows total 24 billed hours, with corresponding teacher assignment logs and attendance present-time entries. Responsible-adult/parent certifications are blank. It supplies partial reported service evidence, not a complete audited ledger or an authenticated link to April 21's attachment.
April 20, 2026
School Leadership refers service concerns and promises to forward the court update
Seiders says Saimre will contact the parent about service concerns and, in a separate reply, says she will forward the court update to Woodard. Those are documented responses and a stated next step; neither verifies the court outcome, completed forwarding or delivered services.
April 21, 2026
NNPS accounts for 56 of 72 instructional hours, with 16 remaining
Saimre’s supplied reply states that 56 hours have been delivered against NNPS’s stated 72-hour total, leaving 16 hours to complete. She says the instructor will coordinate remaining sessions and that an instructional log is attached; no log is included in this supplied PDF. The parent acknowledges the update. Verify the dated ledger, completion and the January 15-March 22 accounting period against the separate January 23 service-grid date.
April 21, 2026
Public minutes record approval of the special-education annual plan
Posted minutes record 7-0 approval of the Special Education Annual Plan. The agenda identifies a 2026-2027 presentation. This is division-level oversight context, not proof the board knew this child’s situation or that individual services were delivered. The complete adopted and event-date 2025-2026 plans remain needed; minutes and agenda differ on the seconder.
May 1, 2026
Behavior plan identifies monitoring and later review dates
The plan names Carleen Holmes for management/data collection, describes intermittent collection and review, and lists September 30 and November 30, 2026 team-review dates. Those dates identify records to check; the absence of a review record here does not establish that the meeting was missed.
May 5, 2026
Administrative note relies on consultation and references assessments
The reviewer records Woodard’s explanation that frequent staff consultation showed no pattern of disciplinary-procedure failure. It also references reviewed video whose link is inactive and a bullying-assessment spreadsheet. The spreadsheet URL is removed to protect other students. The note alone does not establish this child’s findings or completed protective measures.
July 27, 2026
NNPS reports an error using the reading screener
Faulk says she also receives an error. This documents a reported access problem, not a completed screening or a finding about the student’s reading needs.
July 29, 2026
NNPS describes a screener and accommodation-review sequence
After the parent reports the link still fails, Faulk describes using the screener once available and scheduling an IEP meeting to consider the accommodation before reading assessments. The record does not establish the screening outcome, adopted accommodation or dates of later assessments.
September 12, 2026
Supervisor sends a proposed amendment and notice for consideration
The quoted September 12 transmittal says a proposed amendment, PWN and safeguards are attached and asks agreement before electronic consent. Those attachments are absent from that eight-page email PDF. The separately recovered IEP supplied with the September 25 message is internally dated September 8, but exact identity with the earlier September 12 draft is not authenticated.
September 16, 2026
NNPS acknowledges 16 owed hours and says the current IEP remains effective
After the parent disputes an alleged eight-hour draft balance, Jury promises correction to 16 homebound hours owed. She says no proposed draft changes were implemented without consent, acknowledges advance communication should have preceded a schedule change, describes an administrative Reading Lab adjustment and offers an IEP meeting. A parent acceptance of Tuesday 11 AM does not establish attendance, adopted revisions or completed services. The separately recovered September 22 notice and September 25 transmittal now describe a reconvened meeting; final operative version, consent and delivery remain separate questions.
September 22, 2026
PWN records reconvening, 16 prior-year math hours and reading trial
The notice says the team reconvened to discuss the September 8 amendment and agreed to 16 hours of residual homebased instruction from 2025-2026, spread through 2026-2027 with a math focus. It also proposes advance schedule-change notice, a classroom audio/TTS trial, comparative data, uPAR assessment and end-of-first-semester review. This is a stated decision/plan, not completed instruction or final consent.
September 25, 2026
Staff sends meeting paperwork; IEP retains eight-hour wording
The forwarded 3:56 PM staff message calls it the September 22 meeting and requests agreement before a ParentVue consent request. The supplied 25-page IEP retains an internal September 8 date and eight owed hours on p. 11, despite the PWN’s 16. This is a version/correction discrepancy, not proof of an adopted eight-hour reduction. Final consent and operative document remain needed.
September 27, 2026
Newly supplied IEP copy contains dated parent agreement
The new copy has a checked agreement and parent signature dated September 27. Staff signature dates show September 24-25; these are not independently established meeting dates. Internal document date remains September 8, and the Parent Input paragraph retains eight owed hours. This narrows the consent-copy gap while the 16-hour reconciliation, operative-version history and actual service completion remain open.
September 30, 2026
A scheduled behavior-plan review date has passed
The May plan lists this date for team review. The recovered source set does not supply its outcome. Request the review record and updated monitoring data rather than assume the review did not occur.
October 20, 2026
Supervisor proposes an instructional service schedule
The displayed email says a proposed schedule is attached and asks agreement. That attachment is absent from this email PDF. An undated, separately supplied 16-session math plan is now recovered, but its native original transmittal/version is not authenticated. The plan is not completion evidence.
October 21, 2026
Parent broadly accepts schedule and asks about missed Tuesdays
The displayed October 21 reply says the proposed plan appears to work and asks for flexibility for illness/appointments without losing hours. Retain parent assent alongside the staff proposal; this is not completed-session evidence.
October 26, 2026
Staff promises 16 hours; parent confirms Tuesday readiness
The displayed staff reply allows flexibility, offers a next-day start and promises 16 hours before SOLs. The parent agrees Tuesday is fine. The separately recovered 16-session plan and September 22 prior-year-hours notice add context; exact April-ledger reconciliation, final consent and completed lessons remain unverified.
October 27, 2026
Staff reports setup for that afternoon
The displayed 11:57 AM message says everything is set up for that afternoon. It documents a setup statement, not attendance, duration, subjects or a completed session.
October 27, 2026
Nine-PDF intake adds partial service records and refines earlier gaps
Review of 126 supplied physical pages produces five individual redacted records with ten publication pages. March delivery documentation, September owed-hours acknowledgment, prior-period service row, police charge entry and signed threat-form rendition refine earlier questions. Repeated plans/MDR/correspondence are not independent corroboration; clinical material, identifiers, juvenile photos and child handwriting remain private.
October 31, 2026
Separate math plan supplies 16 proposed sessions
ANN’s review date, not the plan’s issue date. The undated, separately supplied plan schedules 16 one-hour math sessions from October 27, 2026 through May 4, 2027. It is consistent with the staff scheduling chain, but original attachment linkage and actual attendance/completion remain unverified. The cumulative-hours column is planned arithmetic.
January 20, 2026
Therapist letter recommends educational supports
The parent-supplied CHKD letter recommends classroom, emotional-regulation, testing and communication supports. The publication copy retains selected educational recommendations while omitting the child’s identity and clinical history. A clinician recommendation does not establish school receipt, an adopted IEP term or delivered services.