This page was read by OCR. Text can misread numbers, dates or table columns. Check the PDF before quoting or interpreting it. Redacted areas remain redacted.
AUDIT NEWPORT NEWS / SOURCE RECORD
Interview scope and written accounts
REDACTED PUBLICATION COPY | REVIEWED OCTOBER 27, 2026
Source pp. 3-4 of the January 6 memo. Names in these passages are masked. The memo records the absence of a suspect
interview while expressly acknowledging written accounts; both statements must be read together.
Source p. 3: on-scene investigation and later written statements
On Scene Investigation:
left the school before | knew the extent of the altercation
between her and [ H. EEE J was present with her mother in the
school after the incident. They both wished to speak with me and that is when
HEB provided her account of events. | also obtained photos of
face. | later received written statements from Assistant Principal Adkinson
from [I ES. EE ac several other students.
Source p. 4: suspect-interview field
Suspect Interview:
No suspect interview was conducted.
Source p. 3: police summary of the student's written account
Ms. [MI provided a written statement to [E statf. in her
statement, she explained how she was bullied for the past several months and
has not reported it. Ms. [i was allegedly talking about Ms. MJ to her friend
in the classroom. In her statement, vs. advised she was, 鈥渇ed u ind
punched Ms. J in the face, and threw a desk and a chair at her. Ms. a:
statement is attached to this report.
The narrative contains apparent participant-name reversals; masking does not correct the original. Written student accounts in the
private packet describe punching and furniture throwing, while accounts differ on sequence and include reported prior comments.
Several later statements are dated January 6, after the December 30 entry and January 2 RMS print. Obtain the evidence
inventory, receipt dates and correction history before inferring what was considered at charging.
The 48 pages provide a substantially broader written packet than the three earlier screenshots. They contain no actual
body-camera recording, final signed court order or selected NNPD complaint-review outcome. Child photographs and witness
handwriting remain private. Overlapping renditions are not additional corroboration.
Selected source pixels; black bars remove identifying or private information 2/2Jump to an indexed page (2 of 2)