This page uses extracted PDF text. Text can misread numbers, dates or table columns. Check the PDF before quoting or interpreting it. Redacted areas remain redacted.
used to communicate about public business. (We have no public records
responsive to items 2 and 3 as the social media accounts are private accounts,
not public accounts subject to FOIA.)
3. Any available Facebook, Instagram, Meta Business Suite, or related
records showing blocked users, restricted users, hidden comments,
deleted comments, moderation logs, keyword filters, profanity filters,
page settings, or administrator/moderator activity for any responsive
account used for public business. (We have no public records responsive to
items 2 and 3 as the social media accounts are private accounts, not public
accounts subject to FOIA)
4. Any communications involving Councilman Eley, Gee C. Eley, City
Council staff, Communications, IT, the City Clerk, or the City Attorney’s
Office concerning social media blocking, deleted comments, hidden
comments, resident complaints about being blocked, or whether an
elected official may block residents from a public-facing social media
page. (attached)
5. Records identifying any administrators, moderators, editors, page
managers, Meta Business Suite users, city staff, or city-related personnel
with access to any Eley-related social media account used for public
business. (no responsive records)
For context, I understand that public officials may remove threats, spam,
harassment, doxxing, impersonation, obscenity, or unlawful content. The
concern here is whether residents are being blocked or restricted
because of viewpoint, criticism, or questions about public matters.
I am not asking the City to make a legal conclusion. I am requesting
existing records so the facts can be reviewed under the proper standard,Jump to an indexed page (5 of 5)