This page was read by OCR. Text can misread numbers, dates or table columns. Check the PDF before quoting or interpreting it. Redacted areas remain redacted.
standards would apply, whether Petitioner would have an opportunity to
respond or be represented by counsel.
22. Additionally, school staff have referenced the existence of an internal email
authorizing Petitioner to conduct school-related drop-offs and pickups despite
the ban. However, no such email has been provided to Petitioner, and no
formal documentation has been issued confirming the scope or terms of this
alleged permission. This lack of transparency further reinforces that the
punishment is being applied arbitrarily, without consistent standards or written
guidance.
23. These actions are not neutral or administrative in nature. Respondent Stewart
used his authority to retaliate against a parent who persistently raised
uncomfortable but legitimate concerns about NNPS鈥檚 failure to ensure student
Jump to an indexed page (9 of 9)