This page was read by OCR. Text can misread numbers, dates or table columns. Check the PDF before quoting or interpreting it. Redacted areas remain redacted.
3. The ban, which remains in effect, prevents Petitioner from fulfilling essential parental
responsibilities, including student pickup and drop-off, attending school events, and
participating in school-related meetings. Respondents have not provided any formal
accommodations or lawful alternatives to enable Petitioner to safely and effectively
remain involved in his children’s education.
7. The continued enforcement of this ban not only exposes Petitioner to the risk of criminal
prosecution for engaging in lawful parental responsibilities, but also places his children at
risk by preventing him from safely coordinating their transportation and well-being—
duties he has consistently fulfilled and advocated for. The use of a blanket ban, followed
by shifting, ad hoc instructions regarding pickup locations, has created ongoing
confusion, risk, and avoidable harm.
Jump to an indexed page (4 of 4)