INDEPENDENT LOCAL NEWSNewport News, Virginia
Back to the record

Document text · Page 4 of 6

Newport News School Board v. Z.M. — opinion, 240833

Text from the approved public copy. Page numbers follow the PDF sequence.

Open Source Document

This page uses extracted PDF text. Text can misread numbers, dates or table columns. Check the PDF before quoting or interpreting it. Redacted areas remain redacted.

4 The arguments of the parties center on whether the waiver of sovereign immunity found in Code § 22.1-194 contains one prerequisite or two. The School Board argues that two conditions must be satisfied for sovereign immunity to be waived under this statute: (1) a vehicle owned or operated by a school board must be “involved in an accident” and (2) insurance coverage must be available. The plaintiff responds that the statute contains only one prerequisite for sovereign immunity to be waived and that is the existence of insurance coverage. The plaintiff maintains that the statute does not require the involvement of a school board vehicle in an accident. In interpreting a statute, we seek “to effectuate the intent of the legislature as expressed by the plain meaning of the words used in the statute.” Llewellyn v. White, 297 Va. 588, 595 (2019). Accordingly, we “appl[y] the plain language unless the words are ambiguous or such application would render the law internally inconsistent or incapable of operation.” Id. In addition, waivers of sovereign immunity are strictly construed. Carter, 267 Va. at 245 (citing cases). The plain language of Code § 22.1-194 contains two prerequisites for a waiver of sovereign immunity. First, a “vehicle” owned, operated, or insured by a school board must be “involved in an accident.” The waiver does not apply across the board to any situation covered by an insurance policy; rather, it applies when the specified vehicles are “involved in an accident.” We are not at liberty to ignore this language. Second, the waiver applies if there is insurance coverage, and only to the extent of such coverage. Code § 22.1-194. Here, the parties do not dispute that insurance coverage is available. However, we conclude that the waiver of sovereign immunity does not apply because, in this instance, the bus was not a “vehicle involved in an accident.”
Jump to an indexed page (6 of 6)

Report a privacy or text-extraction issue through publication requests.