This page was read by OCR. Text can misread numbers, dates or table columns. Check the PDF before quoting or interpreting it. Redacted areas remain redacted.
Case 3:22-cv-00134-JAG-MRC Document 26 Filed 12/22/22 Page 6 of 12 PagelD# 135
claims, (See ECF No. 23, at 1-8.) The Court believes that Melby intends to set forth his claims
in the section he identifies as “Identifying what Civil Rights were Violated.” (Id. at 8-13.) The
Court relies on this section for both the statement of his claims and the identification of the
defendants who are liable. Accordingly, it appears that Melby raises the following claims in his
Particularized Complaint:*
Claim One: Defendant Armstrong “violated my interest in liberty when he refused
to apply my time credit properly” and “produced inaccurate records.”
(Id. at 8.)
Claim Two: Defendant Morgan and Vergakis “failed to preserve inmates’ right to
exercise in the facilities outdoor recreation yard.” (/d. at 9.)
Claim Three: Defendant Walker deprived Melby his “liberty” when he “was placed
into disciplinary segregation without being found guilty of any
infraction nor having a proper disciplinary hearing.” (Id.)
Claim Four: Defendants Morgan and Walker refused to allow Melby to earn
financial compensation for his work in the jail. (Jd. at 10-11.)
Claim Five: Defendants Chandler, Murray, and Evans violated the Freedom of
Information Act when they refused to provide Melby with Chandler’s
or Evans’s badge number. (Jd. at 11.)
Claim Six: Defendants violated Melby’s “right to due process of law.”
(a) Defendant Walker “altered the integrity of my disciplinary hearing
report.” (Id. at 12.)
(b) Defendant Chandler “responded to a grievance that was about her
actions which is a substantial conflict of interest.” (Id.)
(c) Defendant Petitfere “lost or destroyed my inmate request forms that
were critical in me starting my initial grievance/and simply
delayed/obstructed my right to due process.” (Id.)
Claim Seven: Defendants Walker and Hughes violated Melby’s “right to be free from
discrimination and prejudice” when Defendant Hughes “lied to me on
body camera and consistently pursued telling me false information in an
effort to stop me from taking action against Sgt. Walker.” (Id. at 12.)
‘ Melby indicates that there are nine claims in his Particularized Complaint. (ECF No. 23,
at 7.) However, the Particularized Complaint appears to have eight discernable claims for relief.
(See id. at 8-13.)
Jump to an indexed page (12 of 12)