INDEPENDENT LOCAL NEWSNewport News, Virginia
Back to the record

Document text · Page 5 of 5

Lloyd v. Morgan — opinion and order, Doc. 25

Text from the approved public copy. Page numbers follow the PDF sequence.

Open Source Document

This page uses extracted PDF text. Text can misread numbers, dates or table columns. Check the PDF before quoting or interpreting it. Redacted areas remain redacted.

and thus, does not appear to have complied with federal service requirements. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) ("If a defendant is not served within 120 days after the complaint is filed, the court--on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff --must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time. But if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court must extend the time for service for an appropriate period."). Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE, within twenty-one days of the date of this Opinion and Order, why this Court should not: (1) dismiss this action against defendant "Jane Doe" based on Plaintiff's failure to timely identify and serve such defendant; and (2) decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction and dismiss the remaining state-law claim against the Sheriff pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367 (c) (3) . The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Opinion and Order to all counsel of record. IT IS SO ORDERED. Norfolk, Virginia March cJQ , 2015 VB©/s/ Mark S. Davis United States District Judge
Jump to an indexed page (5 of 5)

Report a privacy or text-extraction issue through publication requests.