INDEPENDENT LOCAL NEWSNewport News, Virginia
Back to the record

Document text · Page 4 of 10

Commonwealth v. Knight-Walker — Supreme Court opinion, 250267

Text from the approved public copy. Page numbers follow the PDF sequence.

Open Source Document

This page uses extracted PDF text. Text can misread numbers, dates or table columns. Check the PDF before quoting or interpreting it. Redacted areas remain redacted.

4 Knight-Walker entered a conditional guilty plea that allowed her to appeal the denied suppression motion. She was sentenced to serve twelve months, with twelve months suspended. Knight-Walker appealed to the Court of Appeals. A divided panel of that court reversed her conviction, reasoning that Officer Allen’s questions impermissibly extended the duration of the stop and, as a consequence, the contraband that the officer recovered must be suppressed. Knight-Walker v. Commonwealth, Record No. 1118-23-1, 2025 Va. App. LEXIS 43 (Jan. 28, 2025). One judge dissented and would have affirmed the validity of the stop. Id. ANALYSIS The Fourth Amendment prohibits “unreasonable searches and seizures.” U.S. Const. amend IV. A traffic stop constitutes a “seizure” under the Fourth Amendment and is subject to review for reasonableness. See Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806, 810 (1996). In this instance, the reason for the stop is not at issue. Instead, the defendant challenges the officer’s conduct during the stop, arguing that it was impermissibly extended. A defendant’s claim that a seizure occurred in violation of the Fourth Amendment “presents a mixed question of law and fact that is reviewed de novo on appeal.” McCain v. Commonwealth, 261 Va. 483, 489 (2001). In reviewing such a claim, we are “required to give deference to the factual findings of the trial court and to determine independently whether, under the law, the manner in which the evidence was obtained satisfies constitutional requirements.” Id. at 490. I. T HE OFFICER DID NOT IMPERMISSIBLY EXTEND THE TRAFFIC STOP. Whether an officer acts reasonably during a traffic stop depends on the circumstances the officer faces. No specific time period determines the acceptable duration of a traffic stop; instead, reviewing courts must evaluate “‘what the police in fact do,’ and whether the officers
Jump to an indexed page (10 of 10)

Report a privacy or text-extraction issue through publication requests.