Public Records

April 23 at 12:20 p.m., Seely followed a phone call about Discovery safety-audit review and cited § 22.1-279.8(B). Her characterization of the procedure is attributed correspondence, not an independent legal conclusion. The email does not establish forwarding to NNPS, completed review or the timing of the final restriction decision. Original page 1 of 2; logo-only second page omitted.

File: dsa-2025-04-23-audit-review-procedure.pdf

City Request Center acknowledgment and referral to Michelle Price as NNPS FOIA officer, dated September 23, 2024 at 1:26 p.m. The request concerns a claimed morning encounter; the response does not establish that the encounter occurred, that video existed, or that footage was produced. Private requester and contact details permanently removed.

File: dsa-2024-09-23-video-request-referral.pdf

The later PDF print header is not evidence that White authored or handled this March correspondence. Publication copy with permanent redactions; original source retained privately.

File: dsa-2025-03-14-administration-records-request.pdf

December 15, 11:46 a.m. An inquiry during the search, not a final no-records determination. Publication copy with permanent redactions; original source retained privately.

File: dsa-2025-12-15-spratley-inquiry-1146.pdf

December 15, noon. A promise to send information does not by itself establish that it was delivered or the release was complete. Publication copy with permanent redactions; original source retained privately.

File: dsa-2025-12-15-spratley-response-1200.pdf

December 15, 11:57 a.m. The City-specific statement does not establish that no request was made to NNPS. Publication copy with permanent redactions; original source retained privately.

File: dsa-2025-12-15-spratley-scope-1157.pdf

Agency and requester correspondence on April 4, 2025; top Spratley reply is dated in the rendered email header. This is a response chain, not the safety audit itself. A separate entry records the April 17 arrangement for review of a redacted audit. Requester assertions remain attributed to the requester. Publication copy; private contact details removed where present. Original retained separately.

File: seely-discovery-safety-audit-2025-public.pdf

Spratley reply dated April 17, 2025 in the rendered email header. The agency discusses excluding vulnerability-assessment components and cites its statutory basis. This reply does not contain the audit or establish that a review occurred. Publication copy; private contact details removed where present. Original retained separately.

File: spratley-discovery-safety-review-public.pdf

Official adopted meeting minutes, linked for the memorial acknowledgment and professional-role chronology. This acknowledgment does not determine FOIA succession, interim responsibility, or request handling.